--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002" 
> > <markmeredith@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff 
<no_reply@> 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine 
<salsunshine@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:51 AM, anon_astute_ff wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > >  MMY actually does a lot of things in a classy way -- 
perhaps 
> > too
> > > > > >  polished for many of our tastes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sterile, elitist and  completely removed from reality has 
little
> > > to do 
> > > > > with real class, which generally isn't something you can 
buy or 
> > put a 
> > > > > label on.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > OK, you don't look like one of the target customers. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > But that he or his "team" eventually
> > > > > >  are the ones that do IT right within 10 years, I think 
is 
> > possible,
> > > > > >  but probably less than 10% probability. That SOMEONE 
does it
> > > right --
> > > > > >  with M. type prices, within 10 years, I think has a 
greater
> > > than 50%
> > > > > >  probability.
> > > > > >
> > > > > I'd stay away from the casinos at Vegas if I were you.
> > > > 
> > > > Because they are without class I presume. If you are 
conserned 
> > about
> > > > my probabilities, are you thinking that its a greater than 10%
> > > > probability that the ne0-TMO will be able to put together 
> > a "service"
> > > > that appeals to those making > $300k ? Wow. you are 
optimistic.
> > > > 
> > > > My point has been that the above is not a non-zero 
probability, 
> > though
> > > > it may be low. As you learn when you formally study 
probability 
> > and
> > > > risk, most people are quite prone to incorrectly assign 
extreme
> > > > probabilities e.g., ("It will never happen").
> > > 
> > > MMY protege Ravi Shankar (pundiji) is now way more popular in 
India
> > > and the rest of the world than MMY, so it's possible some neo-TM
> > > program could emerge someday, but definitely not until after 
MMY 
> > goes
> > > and probably not from within the current inner circle.
> > >
> > 
> > In what way is SSRS more popular?
> >
> 
> My understanding is that at least here in the US most of the 
teachers
> of SSRS's Sahaj Meditation were previously TM teachers. More popular
> in terms of affordable teaching that works? 

More popular with people who are dissatisfied with the TMO as it has 
been since they joined SSRS. That's hardly a large,*mainstream* 
population to draw conclusions from, IMHO.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to