--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "brahmachari108" > <brahmachari108@> wrote: <snip> > > What Maharishi? Talking only about first verse of Rg Ved for > > 30 years makes a maharishi? > > It does if you don't know any better. > > It does if you are so incurious as to have been > *satisfied* with that little actual substance in > 30 years. Or, it does if you actually paid attention to what he was saying (which was, of course, far more than just the first verse of Rg Ved), compared it to other teachings, recognized it as significantly more profound, and then found it continually refining, deepening, and expanding over the years in your own experience with the technique his teaching supports.
> The thing that amazes me is not that people > consider Maharishi a "master," but that they are > satisfied with such a lame definition of what a > "master" is. Lame is as lame perceives, methinks. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
