--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: <snip> > > > The thing that amazes me is not that people > > > consider Maharishi a "master," but that they are > > > satisfied with such a lame definition of what a > > > "master" is. > > > > What is your definition? > > I never use the term 'master,' so it wouldn't > come up.
You just used it above, twice. You obviously have some definition of "master" in mind, because you've just told us MMY is a "lame" example of a master. So how were you defining the term when you used it? If I were trying to come up with a > definition for what I'd consider a happening > spiritual teacher, it would involve one who > was capable of teaching via direct transmission. > That is, being able to give every student the > subjective experience of every state of conscious- > ness he talked about and teach any technique he > knew, all without a word. > > But that's just personal preference. > > > ever > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
