--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > "These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious
> > > consistently proved innocuous."
> > 
> > Note that *even if* these "innocuous" explanations are
> > correct, the investigations were conducted *because*
> > there was statistically significant anomalous trading.
> Judy, please define for us what YOU think statistical significance
> actually means.

Unlikely to have occurred by chance.

> > So all your huffing and puffing about statistical
> > significance was, as I pointed out repeatedly, a non
> > sequitur.
> No, not for the points I have been making. It is the point.

Nope, not the point.  There was never any question
that the trading was anomalous to a statistically
significant degree.

The issue is, and has been from the beginning, your
attempts to divert the discussion to your straw man
notwithstanding, the *reasons* for the statistically
significant anomalous trading.

The 9/11 commission believes, or says it believes, it
found the reasons, i.e., they did not occur by chance,
but there were benign explanations for the anomalies.

If you trust the 9/11 commission, fine, the whole issue
has been settled to your satisfaction.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to