--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > (says Jim, hastily reporting an experience so > > > > > Barry won't put him on the list) > > > > > > > > No need. You see, Jim's never used that old > > > > tried-ant-true TM shuck-and-jive routine that > > > > Judy uses when it comes to "experiences." > > > > > > Anybody remember Barry, a few days ago, vowing that > > > his "ignoring" me since mid-March was such a great > > > success that he'd decided he was going to "ignore" > > > me forever? > > > > Anybody notice that Judy is lying here about > > what I said? > > Here's what Barry said: > > "From my side, it's been so pleasant to *not* interface > with her that I'm going to continue with this little > experiment and continue to ignore her."
Exactly. Does anyone see the word "forever" in that sentence? Does anyone even see it implied? Did anyone notice that Judy did *NOT* apologize for lying or making a misstatement? Not even when it was made apparent that's what she was doing? I *hoped* to ignore her. I still have that hope. But I knew even when I said what I did above that I would probably be unable to do so 100%. Judy is, after all, such a treasuretrove of bullshit that every so often one just *has* to comment on the bullshit. :-) Just as a contrast, since I posted that statement above, Judy has written 18 posts that specifically insulted me, called me a liar and other names, and did their level best *TO* draw me back into a head- to-head confrontation with her. I'd say I've done pretty well to have ignored her as much as I have done. :-) I stand by what I wrote. Judy *USED* to be more honest when it came to her own personal experiences with higher states of consciousness. She was down- right *OPEN* on a.m.t. about NEVER HAVING HAD ANY. But here, faced with an audience that *has* had such experiences, suddenly she's singing a different tune, and *IMPLYING* that she's had experiences that I think most of us here suspect she has not (or she wouldn't say so many stupid things about them). So I stand by my opinion -- she is intentionally LYING (by omission) about her range of subjective experience, and she knows she's lying about it. Now, having made my point, back to ignoring her. Judy really hates that...watch how many posts she makes in the next few days trashing me. The more I ignore her, the more posts she'll make to try to lure me back in to the head-to-head argumentation she lives for. (Just look at how many *other* posters on FFL she's lured into that kind of head-to-head confrontation in the time since I've been ignoring her...a junkie's gotta have her arguments.) Mark my words...I'll bet she makes at least 18 *more* posts insulting me within the next week. :-) :-) :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
