--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > wrote:
> <snip>
> > > The one I linked to is pretty nice, huh?
> > > Wonder why they used a different one?
> > 
> > I don't think Drudge likes her, so he used the most unflattering 
one.
> 
> She's really a very attractive woman.




I actually find her quite attractive myself.





>  She's also
> wonderfully vivacious and extremely articulate in
> the interviews I've seen.
>

Other than the press conference of the other day, I haven't seen her 
interviewed.  From what I've read, I think her politics are the most 
horrible and most destructive.

By the way, concerning Drudge's choice of photos.  Certainly, he 
cherry-picked a most unattractive one purposely, I'll agree to 
that.  But, of course, he did it on purpose and he would probably be 
the first to admit it.

I remember seeing him interviewed by Brian Lamb on C-SPAN a few 
years ago when he was taking callers.  One caller complained to him 
that he thought his coverage of Israel was extremely biased.

Drudge's response?  It was short and I think it summed up the power 
that the internet holds for the individual.  He replied: "If you 
don't like it, start your own website."

Of course, Drudge was just literally one guy -- himself -- sitting 
in his appartment and was a news junkie.  He started a website where 
all he pretty much did was post links to stories that interested him 
and he put on "scoops" that people sent him or that he fished out on 
the internet.  Not being a major news outlet he wasn't subject to 
the usual verification rules or other rules of journalism so he put 
alot of rumors -- many unsubstantiated and, it would turn out later, 
wrong -- that major news outlets could never put out or would wait 
until they got better confirmation before they would put out.

As the story goes, that's why Drudge got the Lewinsky story before 
anybody 'cause Newsweek had it, was going to go with it, but was 
waiting for more verification.  Drudge had the luxury of not having 
to wait, so he went with it and the rest is history.

They say that, today, most journalists and newsrooms in America are 
ALL linked to Drudge and that his website is the #1 place where 
jouranlists go to first for news.

Quite powerful for one individual...and it's pretty much still a one-
man operation as I understand it (Maybe he's got one employee or 
something like that).






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to