--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Re death and dying, I have found Yogananda's books of 
> comfort.  I just started his Gita translation/commentary 
> and it seems packed with all sorts of good information.  

Haven't looked at it in decades. Thanks for the tip;
I'll check it out.

> Personally, I would find it comforting to have some 
> trusty steps to perform as death nears.  But, I also 
> trust that the process will take care of itself, to a 
> large extent.  All this meditating and yoga for all 
> these years, trying to live a "good" life while having 
> some fun, caring for  family. I am counting on a 
> compassionate universe to include me and frankly 
> everyone in the normal flow of transition.  

You've just *nailed* the difference between the Hindu
approach to dying and the Tibetan Buddhist approach
to dying. That is, underlying the Hindu approach to
dying is an assumption that the universe is sentient,
is compassionate, and that it has the ability to act 
on that compassion with regard to the living and the
dying. In the Hindu cosmology, the basic concept is
that the universe really "runs the show" when it comes 
to how and as what one will reincarnate. The Tibetan 
Buddhist approach is more based on free will.  As a 
seeker, you are responsible for your own enlightenment, 
or for the realization thereof. 

If you believe that the universe is really running
everything and you don't have all that much to say in
how and where and as what you incarnate next, where
is the impetus to study the mechanics of death, dying, 
and reincarnation?  You just die and hope for the best. :-)

On the other hand, if you firmly believe that there
are things that you *can* do to further your own
evolution and find a cool next incarnation in which 
*to* further it, then you might tend to study death, 
dying, and reincarnation rather thoroughly indeed.  
That seems to be what the Tibetan Buddhists did.  
Different strokes for different folks, that's all.

> I don't think we all have to feel responsible for 
> learing how to manage each stage of life. 

Nope. But for those who are interested, there is a 
wealth of valuable information available.  Whether
you are interested in that information or not 
probably has a lot to do with how much of a hand
you believe you have with regard to your own evo-
lution, and with regard to how much you think is 
*out* of your hands.

> The analogy that comes to mind is the fundy Christian 
> idea that ONLY thru belief in Jesus can a person be 
> saved.  But what about those who never heard of Jesus?  
> Same with death.  Such a fundamental experience cannot 
> possibly REQUIRE special training available in one part 
> of the world.

Did you hear anyone say it did?

It's a matter of predilection.  You can dive into the 
Bardo and just hope for the best, allowing the universe 
to do everything for you.  And it will.  The universe
is good about that. 

Other people with other predilections might want to 
get more involved, and have more of a say in where 
they're going next, and as what.   :-)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to