In a message dated 4/9/06 6:24:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er, the Hiroshima bombs were tiny by today's standards, and a
tactical nuke probably would be nearly as strong if not stronger,
though presumably cleaner. The point is that for the last 60 years
(almost?) the world has had an agreement NOT to use ANY kind of
nuclear weapon in action against fellow humans.


It's a slippery slope issue.
As I said, it's not a nice weapon. But  the bunker busters are very much smaller than Hiroshima/ Nagasaki bombs. You know Nukes can be so small theses days that they can be placed in artillery shells and fired from artillery pieces. You are right , it is a slippery slope. But as I said earlier, sometimes it takes a thorn to remove a thorn. Or we can allow Iran to pursue their goal. Should all else fail.


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to