--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
> > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have always been uncomfortable with Judy's characterization 
of 
> > Unc
> > > as a liar. Certainly in the realm of Unc's posts, his 
relationship
> > > with  truth is loose, dismissive and distant -- perhaps like a 
> > quick
> > > one-night stand with Lady Truth. And sometimes he appears to 
cast 
> > her
> > > as a submissive that he likes to chain and have his way with --
 
> > after
> > > donning his Dom leathers.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I've always thought that if you wanted to point out that someone 
is 
> > a liar then it's more powerful to SHOW how that person is a liar 
> > rather than to TELL everyone that that person is a liar.  
> 
> Well then you have 1000 Judy posts, which after the first 15 get
> tedious for me.
> 
> I guess you are not addressing my post, though you reposted it, 
since
> I of course said Unc was not a liar. Do you want examples of that -
-
> that he is not a liar? (proving a negative)
> 
> You must not read many posts if you do not find  Unc's relationship
> with  truth is loose, dismissive and distant. Or if you do read 
them
> all, and don't find  that, I am quite surprised at your reading
> comprehension skills, but move on. I am not going to spoon feed 
you.
> 
> What I find of interest are frameworks that provide insight. I 
found
> the author's distinction between lying and bullshitting a useful
> insight. The primary point of my post was that the author's 
framework
> is insightul,IMO. 
> 
> And in my view, Unc provides ample and good examples of the 
author's
> point. If in your reading of Unc, you don't see it, fine. Move on.
> 
> But I posted the above as a humor piece. You may not enjoy the 
humor.
> Fine. Move on. But you would have to be quite asleep at the wheel 
to
> not recognize the following as falling into the humor category.
> 
> "his relationship with  truth is loose, dismissive and distant --
> perhaps like a  quick one-night stand with Lady Truth. And 
sometimes
> he appears to cast  her  as a submissive that he likes to chain and
> have his way with -- after  donning his Dom leathers."
> 
> I imagine unc got a big laugh at that, and I expect some
> (attempted)witty slam from him soon. Its a way some people 
converse --
> trading witty and hopefully insightful barbs. It busts egos, makes 
all
> involved laugh, particularly at oneself, and sometimes gives one
> insight into ones own (warped) behavior. What a great thing!
> 
> > As soon as 
> > someone tells me that someone is a liar, they are disrespecting 
me
> 
> That implies we had respect in the first place. Someone can't take
> away something you have not yet established.
>  
> > because they are not allowing me to come to that conclusion 
> > myself...and when I am SHOWN the facts and allowed to come to 
that 
> > conclusion by myself, then the result is all that more powerful.
>  
> Thats what the Socratic method does. And I am a big fan of that. 
But
> its not the only way to approach making a point and communicating. 
>  
> > Al Franken consistently calls Rush a liar; well, he may be but 
show 
> > me don't tell me. So, to me, Al and Rush are two sides to the 
same 
> > coin.
> 
> Al Franken consistently gives examples of Rush and O'Reilly lies. 
Just
> listen to him. Or read him. Its amazing that you could gloss over 
his
> stuff so quickly as to miss it.
>

The man wrote a book called "Lies and the lying liars who tell them".

Whenever I heard him on the radio (Air America no longer airs in 
Phoenix) he consistently called those he was criticizing -- foremost 
almongst them Rush Limbaugh whom he devoted a weekly hour to --
 "liars".

Yes, he consistently gives examples, as you say, of Rush and 
O'Reilly lies. But that's the point: if he can properly document 
their "lies" he doesn't have to keep telling us that they are "lies" 
and that they are "liars".  But he does...and that detracts from the 
points he may score by proper documentation.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to