While he's often right on, I think Jody (Guruphiliac) missed 
the boat on this one. While the lawyer in question may be
Christian, what he's saying in his lawsuit is *correct*:
it's fuckin' inappropriate for *any* judge *anywhere* 
to be able to compel *anyone* to practice *any* form of 
meditation or spiritual practice for *any* reason. Period.

Maharishi never got this, IMO because he's a control 
freak who *already* believes that he should be able to 
run the lives of his teachers the way *he* feels they 
should be run.  It's a short hop from believing that to
believing that he has the right to mandate the lifestyle 
of everyone else in society.  And he's on record as 
believing that he *does* have that right, and that TM 
*should* be mandated by governments.  

Talk about missing the point.  Personally, I don't see
that much difference between Maharishi's stance on this
subject and that of the Ayatollahs in Iran or Afghanistan 
who wish to "enforce" Islam, or that of religious fanatics 
in every society and in every time who have felt they had
the right to impose their beliefs on others.

The real issue is freedom of choice with regard to one's
spiritual or meditational practices.  In my opinion, anyone 
who is willing to take that freedom away from someone, while 
claiming it's "for their own good," is on the same level as
the despot or dictator who would take away their physical 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/112006e.asp
> Jody (Guruphiliac) comments quite rightly:
> That bulwark of spiritual ignorance impeding progress and cultural
> evolution, the American Family Association, is going after the 
> who sentenced a crack-smoking vote defrauder to a course in 
> Actually, it's TMSM, or Transcendental Meditation Stress 
> and not affiliated with the Madharishi anymore.Leading the charge 
> the AFA is lawyer Brian Fahling:"You've got a governmental actor 
> ordering an individual to participate in something that perhaps may
> run contrary to their own particular beliefs and belief system."
> Still, the attorney says he is not really surprised by the judge's
> order because it is consistent with a larger trend toward
> secularization that is progressing in America.Wait a minute... The
> government is ordering an individual to participate in something 
> is being construed as a religious belief, yet the fact of this is
> evidence of the progressing secularization of America?We guess the 
> is as uptight about his idea of religion as he looks in his 
>  Who'da thunk that?What he means to say is that TM&#8482; is the 
> religion. They all are... except his. There is no doubt the guy 
> be flipping cartwheels if the judge had sentenced the girl to 
attend a
> Southern Baptist church instead. It would have been much harsher
> outcome for the poor thing if you asked us.
> http://guruphiliac.blogspot.com/

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to