--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Nelson" <nelsonriddle2001@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Nelson" 
> <nelsonriddle2001@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], Rick Archer 
> <fairfieldlife@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > Remember that story I posted about a week ago which I 
> entitled "A 
> > > > > > Story for Judy and Barry"? Neither of you commented on it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I thought it was trite and simplistic, actually, Rick,
> > > > > and not at all to the point.  Neither Barry nor I is an
> > > > +++   Does "I is" sound right?  Some of the modern English 
> seems to be
> > > > getting out of hand.  N.
> > > 
> > > Good question.  "Barry am" can't be right, though.
> > > 
> > > I had originally written "are," but that's not correct,
> > > because "neither/nor" takes a singular verb.
> > > 
> > > I can't think of any way to get around "Barry am"
> > > or "I is."  Suggestions?
> > >
> > +++ Maybe Barry and I are not-  we are not (collective)  not sure.
> >     Having failed English one year in high school and, getting
> > remarkably poor grades in it, I have observed that some of the
> > sentence structure I see in the news papers would get you thrown out
> > of school altogether in the early fifties.
> >     It looks like no one ever heard of a split infinitive which is a
> > major gripe and, I am expecting to see "throw the horse over the 
> fence
> > some hay" any day now.   N.
> >
> 
> "To go boldly" sounds stupid compared to "to boldy go." The reason 
> why we "can't" split an infinitive is because Latin simply CANNOT. 
> English CAN, and the verb is "to boldly go," which has pretty much 
> the same meaning as "to go boldly" or "boldly to go," but is it's own 
> verb in English.
> 
> The grammarians have been wrong for what, a thousand years? That's 
> OK, just think of it as the last gasp grasp the Roman Church has had 
> on the English language.
>
+++ I didn't take Latin so maybe that would explain my problem.
     Took French instead and got low marks in that too but can still
read a little of it.
    Back then,an adverb had to come after the verb but in the meantime
I guess they could have changed it.  N.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to