Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: MMY in a recent call -

Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:30:55 -0700


On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:21 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> On Apr 24, 2006, at 2:54 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
> 
> > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 24, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> > >
> > > > When it comes to expounding Vedic knowledge, MMY is still on 
the
> > ball.
> > >
> > >
> > >   I particularly found his comment that "Buddhism has it's God"
> > quite
> > > telling...
> > >
> > No understanding of Supremacy, Ultimate Reality in the Buddhist
> > traditions? Is it all just higher or lower, relative to something
> > else? No Absolute Reality? All of these are expressions of God, 
yes?
> 
> God's are part of a conditioned realm and therefore part of 
samsara.  
> God's are just another interdependently arising appearance...

You refer to gods, plural, dieties, that necessarily are incomplete. 
That ain't what the mahesh dude was referring to.

Well, what he said was:

"Christianity has a God, and Islam has a God, and Buddhism has a God, and this one has a God, and this one has a God."

Are we to assume that IHVH, Allah and God of the Buddhists are all one--presumably they're worshipping the Unified Field of 20th century physics? Of course even if you look at monotheistic faiths you will see a multitude of gods, not just one.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Reply via email to