--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk"
> <shempmcgurk@>
> > > wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > I don't care what OTHER people mean by the term...I know
what
> > the
> > > > PROPER definition is...and the proper definition includes
the
> > > > internet.
> > >
> > > The *technical* definition includes the Internet,
> > > along with movies, books, comic books, street signs,
> > > etc., etc., etc.
> > >
> > > > See wikipedia.com and search "media".  You'll see that,
while
> > > > correct in your claim that it "usually" means the mainstream
> > media
> > >
> > > Q.E.D.  Thanks for confirming my point.
> > >
> > > Now say, "Sorry, Judy, I should have realized you
> > > were using the term in its standard sense and not
> > > in its technical sense."
> >
> > From: "media" under wikipedia.com:
>
> Say, "Sorry, Judy, I should have realized you
> were using the term in its standard sense and not
> in its technical sense."
>

Ah, that's the very point, my fine feathered friend.

You see, Judy, we are discussing all of this on...THE INTERNET. 
You, on a REGULAR BASIS, link to and cite INTERNET ARTICLES on this
INTERNET FORUM.

Why, pray tell, would the default be that "media" wouldn't include
the internet in its proper definition when you are such a person?????

It is you, my dear, who created the environment in which it would
have been improper to use it in any other sense.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to