--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<jpgillam@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Comments interleaved below.
> > >
> > > --- TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's an interesting idea, but IMO the only way
> > > > you could make such a system useful is to make
> > > > voting mandatory. 
>
> While I understand and appreciate the problem you are addressing,
the
> solution apppears onerous. Can you imagine having to evaluate each
and
> every one of Sparaig's posts?


What about evaluating every one of anony_xxx's posts?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to