>
> You would think that Colbert's script/dialogue (whatever you wnat to
> call it) would have been previewed before he was allowed to speak.
>
> I can't help but think that somehow, Bush used this as an
> opportunity to show what a stand-up guy he is-that he knows he is
> in trouble and is willing to let himself be taken to task in some
> kind of public fashion of his own choosing-knowing the media would
> play this up, giving Colbert a lot of credit for telling the truth.
LOL. Except that the media have NOT played it up.
To the contrary, the so-called liberal media have,
in fact, almost completely ignored it. Stories about
the correspondents' dinner have focused nearly
exclusively on Bush's turn with the impersonator.
So far, the sole exception has been USA Today,
which quoted Colbert extensively and with relish.
As to Bush being willing to let himself be taken
to task, apparently he was not at all happy with
Colbert. He glowered through most of the routine,
and he and Laura barely acknowledged Colbert
afterwards, leaving almost immediately with grim
expressions.
> And Bush ends up getting credit-raising his esteem in the eyes of
> all-because he was willing to listen, even put his arm around this
> guy.
Sadly, no.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
