I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
non-sexual.  I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
till it all came out.  Then I felt so naive!

I had a good friend in the M initiator group who I felt was angelic
like that.  Then it turned out that he was just gay and couldn't
express his preference and exist in the movement.

Is the movement still puritanical about sex or has the older
demographic loosened things up?



--- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/10/06 10:48 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> I think there's a time and place for everything, and I think
> > celibacy has
> >> its value. I'm open to the possibility that in MMY's case, it was
> > no longer
> >> relevant.
> >>
> > Rick, when you found out and became convinced about MMY's sexual
> > exploits, how did that affect your world?
>
> I found out at a time when I was in the process of becoming
distanced from
> the TMO, so it facilitated that. It also presented an interesting
challenge,
> because I still acknowledge MMY's greatness as a teacher, at least
in his
> heyday, and his powerful darshan, resulting presumably from a very high
> level of consciousness coupled with an ability to radiate that to others
> (all light bulbs are plugged into the same power grid, but some are
little
> Christmas tree bulbs, while others are powerful search lights). So I
took it
> as an opportunity to reexamine a lot of assumptions and concepts. I
heard
> the rumors of this in 1970 when the John Lennon interview came out in
> Rolling Stone, and again throughout the years, when various skin
boys told
> their story. But I was not ready to accept it, so I dismissed it.
>







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to