> Actually, it's primarily the folks I've challenged
> (my guess is this anon person has been one of them
> in the past) who have said this, most notably Barry.
Yes, this would be a very accurate guess when seasoned with contempt.
But when contempt is absent, it is a very inaccurate guess.
We have never interacted in any way.
> But *he* decided to pursue it, even after I suggested
> that was a bad idea--again, because I didn't want to
> get into an argument with me.
"because I didn't want to get into an argument with me."
Here lies the basis for great insight. Contempt always involves some
aspect of a person disliking another aspect of themselves. It is then
externalized onto a "seeming other". Alas, there is no other!
Until this is recognized and realized, inner and outer conflict and
their natural consequence, contempt, continue. There are better
seasonings for the feast of life. Yes?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
