>
>
> In a message dated 5/16/06 3:10:33 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> The question could be simplified. Is there any reason
> that anyone who has learned the basic TM technique
> should think that there is any value in learning an
> "advanced technique" PERIOD, whether they learn it
> officially or not? Based on my experience, I would
> have to say that the answer is a big, fat NO.
>
> I'm being honest here, not contrary. I never subject-
> ively perceived any value whatsoever in any of the
> "advanced techniques" I received while part of the
> TM organization. I think they are and always were an
> mechanism to charge people more money, and that they
> don't do diddleysquat.
>
>
>
> Sorry I have to disagree here. I received several of the advanced techniques
> and found most of them did exactly what they were supposed to do, slow down
> transcending and keep one in the subtler levels of meditation longer, instead
> of the quick in and out several times per meditation. I don't have all of
> them but I won't pay the price demanded now days, so I'll make do with what I
> have.
>
But why not just go learn them from minet or a friend? One interesting question: was SSRS
ever made a TM teacher, letalone an advanced techniques teacher?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
