wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > <shempmcgurk@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > > > <fairfieldlife@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > on 5/19/06 11:09 PM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
> > > <salsunshine@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Rick, I agree completely. Those poor lost souls using
> > phony
> > > > names
> > > > > >> are just wallowing in fear. :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I refrain from standing on the table and singing
> > > > > > obscene songs in my local pizza parlor, because they
> > > > > > might actually throw me out, and I really enjoy
> > > > > > their thin-crust veggie pizza.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What a shame that I experience fear because of what
> > > > > > a grubby, insignificant little pizza joint may do
> > > > > > to me.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah, but you don't actually want to do that, unless you've
> > had
> > > > too much
> > > > > beer and are trying to impress Barry on one of his secret
> > > visits,
> > > > while
> > > > > there are people all over Fairfield who are afraid to do
> > pretty
> > > > normal
> > > > > things for fear of getting excommunicated. For instance, I
> > know
> > > > one fellow
> > > > > who loves English Country Dancing. There is a group here
> which
> > > > does this. He
> > > > > stopped going "because there are Amma people there." There
> are
> > > > many other
> > > > > examples, and new ones every day.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ************
> > > >
> > > > Obviously, with campus appearances by Donovan, an off the
> > program
> > > > TMer who only occasionally does TM and supports a foundation
> for
> > > > Tibetan Buddhist meditation, giving concerts on campus and
> > joining
> > > > the board of directors of Lynch's foundation, and by Lonnie
> > > Gamble,
> > > > whose wife appears topless on his Hawaii farm web site, not to
> > > > mention Lynch's bizarre movies which did not stop him from
> being
> > > on
> > > > MUM's board of directors, there is a change in MUM attempts to
> > > > control the populace. If there is some lag time for the
> average
> > > > person to realize this, that's understandable, but it's
> > certainly
> > > > ridiculous, given the above, that anybody reasonable would
> worry
> > > > about attending a dancing group because Amma people are
> there.
> > > > Sometimes they are after you, but sometimes people are just
> > > > unnecesarily paranoid.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > > But, Bob, you forget the TMO's Prime Directive: which is to give
> > > special privileges to those with money and/or celebrity.
> > >
> > > It's ALWAYS been that way...what makes you think it is becoming
> > any
> > > different now?
> > >
> >
> > Well, it is not true that money and celebrity have been all-
> > important in the movement, as is obvious from the way Bevan dished
> > David Kaplan, which resulted in both brothers going ballistic and
> > tossing Purusha and MD out of their home.
> >
> > > Do you think for one cottin' pickin' minute that a non-celebrity
> > non-
> > > rich David Lynch who would make the kind of soft-core porn that
> is
> > > intrinsically part of "Mulholland Drive" would not be
> immediately
> > > banned from the TMO? (notwithstanding the fact that they are
> > > wonderful lesbian scenes).
> > >
> > > Do you have any doubt whatsoever?
> > >
> >
> > This doesn't make any sense -- obviously a maker of softcore porn
> > who was not in TM management would not be thrown out of anything.
> > And the fact that a film maker like Lynch is now in TM management
> > only proves the point I was making that attitudes in Bevan land
> are
> > changing.
>
>
>
> Maybe I wasn't clear in what I was trying to say.
>
> Do you think a soft-core pornographer who was NOT famous like David
> Lynch or not as rich would be accepted in ANY management or trustee
> position in the TMO?
>
> What I'm suggesting to you is that he would not. But being, first
> and foremost, a celebrity and, secondly, rich, means that Lynch is
> allowed to be an exception.
>
> Do you not agree?
>
Actually, David Lynch is probably the top moneymaker (who's not into
real estate) in the movement these days. Especially if Lawson is right
about the 500 people his movement has subsidized.
JohnY
> >
> >
> > > What about Doug Henning's long hair in the '70s and '80s? Do
> you
> > > have any delusions why he was able to keep it when virtually
> > anyone
> > > else in the Movement would have been ejected?
> > >
> >
> > There were always exceptions to the hair rules, especially for
> > people in the entertainment industry, and in any event, Doug
> Henning
> > was not really part of TM administration, not in the same way that
> > David Lynch is (he's on the board of directors of MUM). One hair
> > rule being that people over 35(?) who had previously worn beards
> > were OK to continue doing so, which is why an non-rich MIU atty
> > (director of grants admin) had a beard in the 70s.
> >
>
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
