>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> <snip>
> > However eventually this was supplanted with the idea that
> > consciousness *was* the unified field--and thus the infamous
> > Hagelin article where he gave up his own expert view (that
> > consciousness was *not* the unified field)
>
> Documentation, please, that this was indeed his view.
>
> Remember that he came to MIU in the first place because
> his expert view was that consciousness *was* the unified
> field.
>
Hagelin did his initial tweaks on Flipped SU(5) based on conversations with MMY about
Vedic Cosmology. This lead to the long-term collaboration with Ellis and Nanapolis that
established the reputation of all three. Some years later, MMY insisted that Hagelin take
another look at the relationship between Veda and Physics, claiming that the connection
ran far deeper than Hagelin realized. Hagelin initially was quite skeptical, but went ahead
and talked to MMY anyway. At the end of the discussion, several days long, Hagelin stated
that MMY had convinced him that the parallels with QM were overwhelmingly close and
that not only was Consciousness the Unified Field, as he had been saying for many years,
but that the Vedic description of the way in which things happened was uncannily close to
the modern Physics findings.
THIS initial skepticism of Hagelin may be what everyone is thinking of. It's no secret.
Hagelin discribes it in detail on an MIU Video Magazine tape.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
