--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted > > > > > here many times. > > > > > > > > > > But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for > > > > > participants on a spiritual site to have any suggestions > > > > > in their minds that drugs are a good thing. > > > > > > > > The editors of Tricycle, probably the most > > > > respected Buddhist journal, disagreed. A few > > > > years ago they devoted an entire issue to a > > > > discussion of the relationship of drugs and > > > > spiritual development. It was a wonderful > > > > issue, very ballsy, and presented viewpoints > > > > from all sides, but without any of the rancor > > > > and moralism we're starting to see here. > > > > > > > > Tricycle: The Buddhist Review. New York: > > > > Buddhist Ray, Inc. Vol. VI, number 1, Fall, 1996. > > > > > > > > > > I'm right; they're wrong. > > > > > > But, of course, they're entitled to their opinion...just as that > > > Dutch group of pedophiles who are trying to start their own > > > political party because they feel it's okay to bugger teenage > > > boys...and they put up a good argument for it: > > > > > > http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread210052/pg1 > > > > > > Without reading it, I am guessing that the Buddhists who wrote the > > > above tract are on a par -- at least rationally -- with the > > > pedophile party. > > > > Oh my. Equating spiritual use of ganja with pedaphiles. This has got > > to be the lowest form of Non Sequitur on FFL yet. And its amittedly > > not even based on reading the article. Pure specualtion. Oh my. We are > > not working with an unbiased, clear, free inquiry kind of mind here. > > But shemp clearly has his reasons even if he didn't read the article, > just like the kids who killed and tortured the kittens at Noah's Ark > shelter several years ago had their reasons for doing so. I just > don't happen to agree with either of them. >
Killing kitties can be fun. Typical liberal ruining everybody else's fun just because something is politically incorrect. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Protect your PC from spy ware with award winning anti spy technology. It's free. http://us.click.yahoo.com/97bhrC/LGxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
