sparaig wrote:

>--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>sparaig wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Vaj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>On Jun 8, 2006, at 7:57 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>--- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A friend who is on the test team for  MS internet explorer says the
>>>>>>>reason it has not been added sooner to MSIE was because MS's emphasis
>>>>>>>is on a "standards compliant" browser rather than one with lots of
>>>>>>>bells and whistles, therefore MSIE will always be more conservative
>>>>>>>compared to what's out there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Gotta chuckle at your friend's naivete. IE has
>>>>>>long been known as the *least* standards-compliant
>>>>>>browser on the market. Microsoft seems to believe
>>>>>>that if they do it, that constitutes a 'standard.'
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>All I know is when something doesn't work in Firefox, which  
>>>>>occasionally happens, if I go to MSIE, it always has worked. Not sure  
>>>>>why, it may be it handles *badly* written code better and Firefox is  
>>>>>too standards compliant. in any event these people on the test team  
>>>>>are far from naive, quite the opposite, he actually has switched to a  
>>>>>Mac at home, builds his own PC's and uses Firefox! A Bay area  
>>>>>developer just snagged him in any event.
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>I have heard from some engineers that Firefox still has some memory 
>>>>leaks in it that haven't been fixed.  That's why I occasionally get the 
>>>>Linux equivalent of a crash window with the ability to send Mozilla a 
>>>>bug report.  I just got tired of this hole and that hole being found in 
>>>>IE and of course wanted to dump the whole virus and trojan thing 
>>>>altogether and primarily use Linux for email and web browsing.  There's 
>>>>no IE for Linux, of course. :)
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>The biggest security problem with Windows is the fact that a good portion of 
>>>IE 
>>>      
>>>
>libraries 
>  
>
>>>are actually kernel-level WIndows libraries. This means that any security 
>>>problem for IE 
>>>affects ANY application that might be connected to the internet in some 
>>>fashion, even 
>>>      
>>>
>if IE 
>  
>
>>>itself is never started up. Windows itself uses IE libraries, BTW...
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>As a technical director for a software company in the 1990s I was 
>>invited to a number of Microsoft seminars and actually I raised the idea 
>>of being able to use a library interface to contact the Internet so the 
>>user wouldn't have to go to  IE or have it pop up and break the 
>>immersion of the interface.  It also does away with a lot of 
>>implementation problems for the developer as well as support problems.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>You missed the key word "kernel-level" --as long as the libraries sit in the 
>kernel, they're 
>part of the OS and have all the privleges and power of the rest of the OS.
>
>  
>
No I didn't.  That's what we asked MS for access to.  But most of it is 
still in DLLs considered part of the kernel.

>There's nothing wrong with system-wide libraries, and MacOS X has several 
>different 
>kinds, but NONE of them, save the kernel itself, is in the kernel.
>
>The exception is the Sony CD protection which requires a reboot to install, 
>and actually 
>modifies the kernel in order to implement a rather nasty and dangerous copy 
>protection 
>scheme --dangerous because it acts just like the IE libraries that sit inside 
>the Windows 
>kernel.
>
>  
>


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Everything you need is one click away.  Make Yahoo! your home page now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to