--- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <jyouells@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/8/06 5:15:05 P.M. Central Daylight > > > > > > Time, flanegi@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > Also read an interesting statistic that among the named > > > > > > terrorist groups in Iraq, Al Zarqawi's bunch was responsible > > > > > > for just 14% of deaths attributed to such groups. > > <snip> > > > > Jim, it doesn't look to me as though this article > > > > says 14% of deaths were due to Zarqawi's attacks; > > > > looks to me like it's 70%. The 14% figure is the > > > > percentage of the Iraqi resistance made up of > > > > Zarqawi's people--the point being that while his > > > > group is relatively small, it's been *very* > > > > effective at killing people: > > <snip> > > > Looks like a case of 'careful and accurate thinking' > > > over 'spontaneous right action'. Good catch Judy. So much for the > > > theory of spontaeous right action, right? > > > > Huh?? > > > > Are you suggesting that a mistake in the relative can't > > be spontaneous right action from nature's perspective? > > > > Nope, I was referring to Jim's pronouncement that Zarqawi's branch was > only causing 14% of the casualties, and his using that as a platform > for his political views. At the same time I was thinking about > Maharishi's pronouncements about enlightened leadership, king Tony > et. all.
I'm afraid I'm not following. If you mean to suggest Jim's action wasn't spontaneously "right," I'd ask again: Is a mistake in the relative necessarily *not* spontaneous right action from nature's perspective? Jim's basic point was sound. He made one mistake in the details, and I happened to be there to pick up on it. He accepted the correction, and the record was set straight, plus he got to highlight the main point of what he was saying. No big deal. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how. http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
