[EMAIL PROTECTED]com
wrote:
>
>In a message dated 6/12/06 3:22:08 P.M. Central
Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]net
writes:
>
>
>
>--- In
_FairfieldLife@FairfieldLifFai_ (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com)
>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], MDi
>
>
>>In a message
dated 6/12/06 11:33:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED].. writes:
>>
>>A friend dropped
in to the chat room on Anorexic Ann's website.
>>
>>
>By the
>
>
>>time he left they were
ready to kill him. :)
>>Great sport:
>>__http://www.anncoulthttp://www.http://www.http://_
>>
>>
>(http://www.anncoulthttp://www.http://www.annhtt_)
>
>
>>(_http://www.anncoulthttp://www.http://www.annhtt_
>>
>>
>(http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi)
)
>
>
>>
>>
>>You can drop into just
about any Chat room for the left,and
>>
>>
>express
>
>
>>conservative views and get the exact same
reaction. I think before
>>
>>
>one attacks Ann
>
>
>>Coulter as being hate filled, while being silent
about someone
>>
>>
>like Al Frankin,
>
>
>>Michael Moore, Alec Baldwin and others who have all called
for
>>
>>
>the stoning ,
>
>
>>lynching or execution of conservatives is being
hypocritical.
>>
>>
>>
>I've read Al
Franken's book on "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell
>Them: A Fair and
Balanced Look at the Right" (excellent by the way,
>if for nothing
else, its rigorous adherence to factual material, and
>the painstaking
way that Franken exposes creeps like Rush Limbaugh),
>and have heard
Michael Moore and Alec Baldwin from time to time on
>the news. Each of
them has said something off the wall occasionally,
>though I've not
witnessed it personally.
>
>On the other hand, Ms. Attention Hog,
Ann Coulter, spews invective
>*every single time* I have seen her on
the news. She is in my
>estimation a real wacko, pathetically craving
the spotlight even at
>the cost of her own self
respect.
>
>
>
>
>
>I think if your sense
of perspective is that Al Franken and Michael Moore
>are reasonable and
factual then you have no other choice but to believe what
>you believe.
It's kind of like when Matt Lauer interviewed Al Franken on the
>Today
Show and Franken said Bush and Rove should be shot, Matt Lauer laughed
>and then when he interviews Coulter and asks about her saying the
Jersey girls
>seemed to be enjoying their husbands deaths, well, she
had just crossed the
>line. Do you see the difference in the two
statements? And do you see the
>difference in the reaction of the
interviewer in the two statements?
>
>
>
Franklin was
making a joke based on the treason laws which would state
that would be
the penalty and is what happened to people who did these
things in the
past. No one could jump on him for making the statement
because it was
*factually* correct.
