--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 28, 2006, at 8:37 PM, authfriend wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj > > <vajranatha@> wrote: > > >> > > >> On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:03 PM, authfriend wrote: > > >> > > >>> --- In [email protected], Vaj > > <vajranatha@> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On Jun 28, 2006, at 2:33 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > <snip> > > >>>>> So anyone who thinks they have become > > enlightened using TM and > > >>>>> the tM-Sidhis, must be deluded? > > >>>> > > >>>> Interesting suggestion. > > >>> > > >>> Gosh, Lawson, it looks like Vaj forgot to answer > > >>> your question. Maybe you'd better ask it again. > > >> > > >> Well it's not an easy answer, nor one I am > > comfortable in > > >> answering, but you asked. > > >> > > >> Delusion or "deluded" is too vague. It's a > > classic "Boomeritis > > >> enlightenment"--really a green meme phenomenon > > where pluralism is > > >> infested with narcissism, "all is one" and let me > > tell you about > > >> it. Because it's a green meme thing, that means > > there is no real > > >> jump to second tier consciousness, no quantum > > leap, no yellow or > > >> turquoise meme. There's a certain aspect of it > > that is both a Mean > > >> Green Meme (MGM, the "sensitive self gone awry) > > and Mean Orange > > >> Meme (MOM, scientific achievment leveraged for > > spirituality's use) > > >> but don't be surprised to also see some other > > first tier memes > > >> thrown in: orthodox, 'one way to experience > > things' Blue > > >> orthodoxy/control and Scientific materialist > > aspects the Orange > > >> meme (e.g. hijacking physics as PR/spin device: > > <cha-ching>). > > > > > > LOL!! Classic Vaj. > > > > LOL, classic Judy--worthless response merely meant > > to inflame. Take > > your Preparation H Judy, it might help! > > > > > > > > I'm glad to hear you weren't comfortable with this > > > answer, Vaj. > > > > No, wrong. I was not comfortable giving a generic > > response to the > > original comment. I was and am comfortable with the > > remarks I did make. > > > > > > 'nuff said. > > > Liar, liar pants afire!
Thanks, Vaj, I really appreciate your material here. I couldn't find the less mucked about version, but I think you have a solid and worthwhile grasp of the assumptions made about 'enlightenment' and who's got it and how, as well as the 'or not'. -- I like your objectivity with respect to our personality disordered contributor as well. Wish I could say those things so clearly. I just shake my head and wonder who looks after her in that Long Island *home*. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
