--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 7/3/06 12:30:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> By the  way, did you know we could have had electric cars, like ten 
> years  ago;
> The technology is there,
> Unfornately it would put filling stations  and repair stations out of 
> business, you see;
> Because an electric car  won't need as many repairs at all.
> And you plug it in your wall at home; so  the Saudi/Bush group
> 
> 
> Where is all of this electricity going to come from? Did you  know
that an 
> enormous amount of electricity is lost, in thin air, just in  the
transmission 
> from power station along the power line grid, before anybody  uses it? 

I would not characterize 7% or so (typical transmission losses in an
electrical grid)  as "enormous". The efficiencies of energy production
(more kwh per unit of energy) (as well as pollution control) is much
higher in large scale plants compared to a car engine and make up for
such transmission losses a number of times over. 

> If we 
> weren't burning the oil in our cars as gasoline, we would be 
burning it to 
> generate electricity to charge those cars up at night. 

Ha. Good one. Oil is used in less than 2-3% of electrical generation
in the US (and most elsewhere) -- mostly for small peaking units used
when demand is highest 10-50 hours a year.

> Too bad we  don't have more 
> nuclear power plants to generate  electricity. 

Its about 20%. Waste disposal for the 100,000 year half life has not
has dolved, nor the security of transportation and storge against
terrorist highjackings of the material. And the history of nuclear had
been a cost disaster. In California, the cost has been so high
compared to other generation sources its a joke -- and a number  of
plants have been retired early (Songs 1 and 2, Rancno Cordova, etc.)
Diablo Canyon, the last great behemouth in California, has such a
history of incredibly high costs per kwh, its laughably -- but sad for
ratepayers . Nuclear does have the lowest fuel costs of any major
generation (except hydro, solar, wind, etc), but huge capital,
operational and safety costs. On the other hand the nuke industry says
THIS time they really do have very cost-competitive untis. If so, let
them compete instead of asking for govt subsidies. And pay the full
cost of externalities for storage and insurance against terrorist
theft. (Unsurmountably high -- and don't ask for exclusions. Pay the
costs if its cost effective.)

If electric cars were deemed most desirable, it would take 20 years +
to change out the current fleet. Enough time to build new electrical
generation. And much of the unused capacity of current generators at
nightime could be used, with no new construction. About 30-40% etra
national generation simply by running plants fully at night and weekends.

Perhaps a more electric hybrid is the ticket. Can run on charge at
night from power company, at low off-peak rates -- and would be good
for most around town trips. Shifts into fuel/hybrid mode 40 mpg + on
longer trips. Hopefully with bio fuels.

We could have had all of this right now, essentially for free if we
had wise energy policies going back 20-30 years. A fuel tax (10 cents
/ year cumulative -- $3 now) reinvested in research and jump starting
demand / economies of scale for low cost batteries, hybrid tech, bio
fuels, etc. would have paid for it self, keeping world oil prices
lower, greatly decreasing or eliminating US need for foreign oil, and
reducing all of the other external -- aka externality costs that
burning oil causes -- national security, health, pollution, global
climate change, etc.







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to