--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > >> Understood. Though, for me that, and related, are the questions of > > > > interest: how does mainstream science use and measure the term BWC (or > > > > EEG coherence,etc); what is the significance of it, that is, is it a > > > > superior state, or one naturally found, is increasing BWC a good > > > > thing, etc. > > > > > > > > > > It's an interesting contradiction. In some contexts, EEG coherence > > is seen as a Very Good > > > Thing, and in others as a Very Bad Thing. Brain-damaged individuals > > often show EEG > > > coherence, presumably because the activity of the brain has not > > differentiated in a healthy > > > manner. Epileptics show EEG coherence due to abnormally firing > > neurons associated with > > > siezures. > > > > > > > Is it clear when viewing or analyzing EEGs when coherence is good and > > when its bad? If not, do we know without doubt that the TM coherence > > is a good type. > > > > From this list, but also from lots of people I have come across in the > > TMO, one could easily hypothesize that the TM type coherence > > diminishes cognitive and logical capabilities. > > > > There's always that. Of course, you have to establish a before/after study to be sure.
Yes. But its scary to think of the before if 'now' is better. :) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
