|
In a message dated 7/11/06 6:40:44 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As Uninformed people getting news second, third and fourth hand
eh?From friends, over the Internet and talking heads, any place but the source.
The president even publicly stated very clearly for all to hear that there was
no link. Yet some people complain that Iraq and 911 are even spoken in the same
breath, not because it confuses people, but because Democrats want the war
in Iraq separated from the war on terror. They believe they are two separate
issues and want it defined as such. Clearly Democrats are desperate for
this so they can say they were tricked into Iraq but support the war on
terror< I really can't believe for one minute that 200 million Americans
believed Saddam was linked to the events of 911 once the FBI had come to the
conclusion that Mohammed Atta did not meet Iraqi intelligence, where ever that
was originally reported to have happened. Nor do I believed the same were
confused when the administration linked Iraq with the war on
terrorism in the same sentence. However, I will grant it that isolating
certain sentences out of an entire speech could easily be misused to cause
confusion by those who would benefit from that
confusion.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Madison, Lecturer to Lose the Right of Fre... authfriend
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Madison, Lecturer to Lose the Rig... MDixon6569
- [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Madison, Lecturer to Lose the Right o... sparaig
