--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TurquoiseB wrote:
> >I'll probably see it anyway, but it inspired
> >Roger Ebert to write one of his rare scathing
> >reviews...
> And guess what film wasn't reviewed on this week's "Ebert and 
> Roper"?   
> Yup, they reviewed "Clerk's 2" and "Monster House" but not "Lady in 
> the 
> Water."  Nor have they reviewed it in advance.   I suspect because 
> Disney owns their show and Shyamalan took "Lady" to Warner Brothers 
> because Disney wouldn't give him enough money ($75 mil) to make the 
> film 
> and Disney is pissed.  Maybe it will show up next week though 
> they've 
> scheduled that to be a "best so far" episode.  The rest of their \
> show 
> tonight was filled with "in the theaters."

I just noticed that I was mistaken earlier, and the
scathing review is not by Ebert himself (who is out
recovering from surgery), but by his editor, Jim
Emerson. It makes more sense now; Roger rarely
stoops this low...he ususally puts his vitriol,
when deserved, into one or two pithy statements
and leaves it at that. This one went on for pages...

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to