It's interesting to me that this forum shows no consensus as to whether superradiance works. Most of us have fond memories of big courses. Most of us thought at one time superradiance was valid. I've run across variations of the theory outside the TM organization. Yet "the sense of the meeting," from what I can determine, is undetermined.
This is a case where I'd like to see some kind of opinion poll like those Trudeau posts at his site. http://cgi.doonesbury.com/cgi-bin/view_poll.cgi --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20060729 > > It couldn't help but make me think of the current > course. There is no "down side" to it for Maharishi. > > If the current conflict settles down on its own, he > gets to (and you all know he will) take all the > credit for it. If it gets worse, he gets to blame > it on the world for not paying for "big enough" > groups of butt-bouncers, and on the TM sidhas who > stayed home. > > Win-win, as they say. > > That said, kudos to those who are actually going. > You're actually *doing* something instead of just > flapping your gums... > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
