--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Translation by Swami Gambhirananda
> > 
> > 2.45 To those who are thus devoid of discriminating wisdom, who
> > indulge in pleasure, [Here Ast. adds 'yat phalam tad aha, what 
> result
> > accrues, that the Lord states:'-Tr.] O Arjuna, vedah, the Vedas;
> > traigunya-visayah, have the three qualities as their object, have 
> the 
> > three
> > gunas, [Traigunya means the collection of the three qualities, viz 
> > sattva
> > (purity), rajas (energy) and tamas (darkness); i.e. the collection 
> of
> > virtuous, vicious and mixed activities, as also their results. In 
> this
> > derivative sense traigunya means the worldly life.] i.e. the 
> worldly 
> > life, as
> > the object to be revealed. But you bhava, become; nistraigunyah, 
> free
> > from the three qualities, i.e. be free from desires. [There is a 
> > seeming
> > conflict between the advices to be free from the three qualities 
> and 
> > to be
> > ever-poised in the quality of sattva. Hence, the Commentator takes 
> the
> > phrase nistraigunya to mean niskama, free from desires.] (Be)
> > nirdvandvah, free from the pairs of duality -- by the word dvandva,
> > duality, are meant the conflicting pairs [Of heat and cold, etc.] 
> > which are
> > the causes of happiness and sorrow; you become free from them. [From
> > heat, cold, etc. That is, forbear them.] You become nitya-
> sattvasthah,
> > ever-poised in the quality of sattva; (and) so also niryoga-ksemah,
> > without (desire for) acquisition and protection. Yoga means 
> > acquisition of
> > what one has not, and ksema means the protection of what one has. 
> For
> > one who as 'acquisition and protection' foremost in his mind, it is 
> > difficult to seek Liberation. Hence, you be free from acquisition 
> and 
> > protection.
> > And also be atmavan, self-collected, vigilant. This is the advice 
> > given to
> > you while you are engaged in your own duty. [And not from the point 
> of
> > view of seeking Liberation.]
> >
> 
> A vishiSTaadvaita view of the same (Shrii Raamaanuja):
> 
> 2.45 The word Traigunya means the three Gunas --- Sattva, Rajas and
> Tamas. Here the term Traigunya denotes persons in whom Sattva, Rajas
> and Tamas are in abundance. The Vedas in prescribing desire-oriented
> rituals (Kamya-karmas) have such persons in view. Because of their
> great love, the Vedas teach what is good to those in whom Tamas,
> Rajas and Sattva preponderate. If the Vedas had not explained to these
> persons the means for the attainment of heaven etc., according to the
> Gunas, then those persons who are not interested in liberation owing 
> to
> absence of Sattva and preponderance of Rajas and Tamas in them,
> would get completely lost amidst what should not be resorted to,
> without knowing the means for attaining the results they desire. Hence
> the Vedas are concerned with the Gunas. Be you free from the three
> Gunas. Try to acquire Sattva in abundance; increase that alone. The
> purport is: do not nurse the preponderance of the three Gunas in their
> state of inter-mixture; do not cultivate such preponderance. Be free
> from the pairs of opposites; be free from all the characteristics of 
> worldly
> life. Abide in pure Sattva; be established in Sattva, in its state of 
> purity
> without the admixture of the other two Gunas. If it is questioned how
> that is possible, the reply is as follows. Never care to acquire 
> things nor
> protect what has been acquired. While abandoning the acquisition of
> what is not required for self-realisation, abandon also the 
> conservation of
> such things already acquired. You can thus be established in self-
> control
> and thereby become an aspirant after the essentail nature of the self.
> 'Yoga' is acquisition of what has not been acquired; 'Ksema' is
> preservation of things already acquired. Abandoning these is a must 
> for
> an aspirant after the essential nature of the self. If you conduct 
> yourself
> in this way, the preponderance of Rajas and Tamas will be annihilated,
> and pure Sattva will develop. Besides, all that is taught in the 
> Vedas is
> not fit to be utilised by all.
>

Wow. That seems so superficial and WRONG compared to MMY's commentary.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to