--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 7/30/06 7:31:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > And JFK didn't *have* an image as a stud. That > was a big secret at the time, in case you've > forgotten. > > If Clinton was trying to develop an image as a > stud, it was his own image of himself he wanted > to boost. > > JFK did have an image as a stud.
Not while he was president. It doesn't matter when the image was > developed. Democrats wanted the Clinton administration to be the > second coming of Camelot. It was hyped when he took office and > Clinton used to speak about how he met JFK when he was a boy and > decided that was going to be his goal, to be president. It wouldn't > be too far fetched for him to want to emulated JFK in any way he > could. Depends on where you draw the "too far-fetched" line. I think that's pretty far over it, simply because there are plenty of other reasons for him to need to be promiscuous. > JFK had Marilyn Monroe, WJC had Sharon Stone. Sharon Stone? Is that another idea you got from Coulter? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
