--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], gerbal88 <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > I have asked Rick to post the PDF of the File I alluded to earlier. > > I have also posted a Word document of some other "real" science > > evaluations of the MishMash Effect. > > Boy, pretty slim pickings, huh? Too bad you couldn't > find anything besides the Markovsky piece that is > actually "scientific." You might try pursuing some > of the leads I provided, see if you can beef it up > a little. > > (You might also want to correct your typo "Afles" for > "Fales," the name of Markovsky's co-author.) >
Gerbal88 should know that I know Markovsky personally. He's a likeable guy and we spent an afternoon together when he was in Tucson many years back. He had dinner with my family. We just disagree on much of what he *concludes* about the ME and TM. Much of what he SAYS in his analysis of the ME is spot on, however: the ME is a very primitive theory, if it deserves that title, and much work would be needed to make it acceptable (not believed, just acceptable) to the rest of the scientific community. That doesn't make the ME wrong, or invalidate the studies, of course. ALL theories start out primitive and need tidying up. Some more than others. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
