Thanks for posting this Jeff.  My friends child is on ADHD drugs and he 
is trying to find an alternative.  I will forward this article to him.

--- In [email protected], "Jeff Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Testimony to the State of Georgia Senate
> Re: Senate Bill 430—TeenScreen
> by Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD
> August 16, 2006
>  
> Whether you speak of teen-screen, infant-screen, toddler-screen or 
> elder-screen (they are all on their way to the nearest school), 
> there is one thing you need to know about psychiatric diagnosis: 
> there is no such thing as a psychiatric "disorder," "disease," 
> or, "chemical imbalance."  And yet, psychiatry, Big Pharma, the 
> House, Senate and White House, drunk on money and power, insist that 
> all psychiatric diagnoses are "diseases" which must be treated, if 
> even by court order; if even they have to call you a "negligent" 
> parent and make the court your child's parent.  
>  
> We continue to accept the "chemical imbalance" lie at our own 
> peril.  Infinite damage has already been done.  Think Columbine, 
> think Conyers, Georgia, where  T.J. Solomon shot six, think Haditha, 
> Iraq, and think of the Armed Forces recruiting shortfalls due to the 
> burgeoning psychiatric epidemic in the nation's schools.  Think of 
> the accumulative toll of our believing in this brazen, 
> Machiavellian, lie.  Think of a child in your own family (like 
> classrooms, every family has one—or more).  
>  
> In 1948, psychiatry and neurology were made into separate 
> specialties—neurology, my specialty, to diagnose and treat actual 
> diseases of the brain; psychiatry to address the emotional and 
> behavioral (psychological) problems in normals, and, in the 
> physically ill as well—none of them diseases. [1]
>  
> In the fifties, chlorpromazine/Thorazine, the first antipsychotic 
> drug was synthesized.  Other psychotropic drugs followed.  Today, 
> 91% of children who see a child psychiatrist are put on a drug, 18% -
> -most of them normal--on a dangerous, deadly, antipsychotic.  
>  
> In 1960, when I graduated from the NYU School of Medicine, no such 
> thing as a psychiatric disease existed. 
>  
> In 1963 when I was the first to analyze the chromosomes of cancer 
> cells from the spinal fluid [2] and in 1969 when I was the first to 
> describe glioma-polyposis syndrome (another word for disease) [3] 
> there was still no such thing as a psychiatric disease—a disease 
> being a demonstrable macroscopic,  microscopic, or chemical 
> abnormalities—a palpable or visible tumor, a positive "Pap" smear or 
> biopsy, or, an elevated blood sugar as in diabetes mellitus or 
> phenylalanine level, in PKU.  
>  
> Little did I know that Psychiatry, Big Pharma and the Federal 
> Government were well along with their "big lie," marketplace 
> strategy--to tell the public—all patients at one time or another, 
> that emotional and behavioral problems were not due to their 
> upbringing, environment, circumstances, but that—eureka!--they 
> were  "disorders"/ "diseases"/ "abnormalities" /"chemical 
> imbalances" of the brain, each needing, or requiring, a  chemical 
> balancer--pill.  
>  
> On September 29, 1970, Representative Cornelius Gallagher of New 
> Jersey launched the Congressional hearing, Federal Involvement in 
> the Use of Behavior Modification Drugs on Grammar School Children:  
> Behavior Modification Drugs in School Children, saying:  "I have 
> received letters critical of minimal brain dysfunction, one of 
> thirty-eight names attached to this condition."
>  
> But, clearly, the "chemical imbalance" strategy was in place.   Dr. 
> Ronald Lipman, Chief of the Clinical Studies Section, FDA, 
> testified:  "…hyperkinesis is a medical syndrome.  It should be 
> properly diagnosed by a medical doctor."   
> 
> In the DSM-III of 1980 it was ADD; in the DSM-III-R of 1987, ADHD; 
> in the DSM-IV of 1994, it was ADHD of another sort.  No science to 
> get in the way. 
>  
> On December 22, 1994, Paul Leber, MD, Director, Division of 
> Neuropharmacological Drug Products of the FDA, wrote to me: "… no 
> distinct pathophysiology for the disorder (ADHD) has been 
> delineated."      
>  
> On May, 13, 1998, F. Xavier Castellanos of the NIMH wrote to me: "… 
> we have not yet met the burden of demonstrating the specific 
> pathophysiology that we believe underlies this condition."
>  
> At the November 16-18, 1998 Consensus Conference, William B Carey 
> [4], speaking on the subject: "Is ADHD a Valid Disorder?" 
> concluded: "What is…described as ADHD in the United States appears 
> to be a set of normal behavioral variations..."
>  
> James M. Swanson and F. Xavier Castellanos [5] reviewed the 
> structural/anatomic MRI research [5-18] concluding:  "… ADHD 
> subjects have on-average 10% brain atrophy."  
>  
> From a floor microphone I (Baughman) challenged Swanson: "Why didn't 
> you mention that virtually all of the ADHD subjects were on 
> stimulant (Ritalin, Dexedrine, Adderall)  therapy and that this is 
> the likely cause of their brain atrophy?"  
>  
> With their main line of evidence shown to be a lie, the Consensus 
> Conference Panel confessed: " ...we do not have an independent, 
> valid test for ADHD…there are no data to indicate that ADHD is a 
> brain malfunction."  
>  
> Palco of NPR observed: "ADHD is like the Supreme Court's definition 
> of pornography: `You know it when you see it.'"  
>  
> On October 9, 2002, Castellanos, et al [6], published the one-and-
> only MRI study of an ADHD-untreated group.  Inexplicably, they 
> failed to use matched controls.  This voided the study.  ADHD 
> remained without validation as a disease while the ADHD drugs—
> methylphenidates and amphetamines remained the probable cause of 
> the "on-average, 10 percent" brain atrophy.   
>  
> In 2002, Weinberger [7] of the NIMH claimed "major psychiatric 
> diseases"…are associated with "subtle but objectively 
> characterizable changes."  However, he could not reference proof 
> that a single psychiatric "disease" actually exists.    
>  
> In 2002, the Advertisement Commission of Holland determined that 
> Brain Foundation-Holland  claim  that ADHD is an inborn brain 
> dysfunction "…gives a wrong and misleading representation and 
> enjoined them to stop.  
> 
> In 2003, Ireland prohibited GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) from claiming on 
> it's Paxil/paroxetine leaflet:  "(it) works by bringing serotonin 
> levels back to normal."   
> 
> While the FDA's Goodman [8], acknowledged that claims that SSRIs 
> correct a serotonin imbalance go "too far," he lied every bit as 
> much, suggesting: "this is reasonable shorthand for expressing that 
> this is a chemically or brain-based problem." 
> 
> Saying any psychiatric diagnosis "… is a brain-based problem and 
> that the medications are normalizing function," is an anti-
> scientific, pro-drug, lie—one that reflects FDA and government 
> policy generally." 
> 
> There is nothing more despicable than a physician who knowingly 
> tells normal patients that they are "sick," "ill," or "diseased," 
> for profit.  Yet this has become standard practice throughout 
> medicine, and at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), American 
> Psychiatric Association (APA), American Medical Association (AMA), 
> American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), 
> American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Academy of Neurology 
> (AAN), Child Neurology Society (CNS), American Academy of Family 
> Practice (AAFP), and countless other organizations. 
> 
> All health care agents and agencies, and all manufacturers of drugs 
> must cease their representations of psychological/psychiatric 
> diagnoses as diseases/ "chemical imbalances."  The right to informed 
> consent--universally abrogated by such lies--must be restored to US 
> medicine.   
>  
> Because psychiatric patients are physically/medically normal but are 
> called "diseased" their right to informed consent has been revoked. 
>  
> Because those made into "patients" are known to normal to begin 
> with, those who "treat" them actually poison them and are guilty, 
> not of an iatrogenic medical mistake, but of willful, for-profit 
> poisoning—a felony. 
>  
> What are we to call it when children die pursuant to a fraudulent 
> diagnosis, such as ADHD, such as the 186 known to have died from 
> methylphenidate/Ritalin, between 1990 and 2000?  First degree 
> murder?  Second degree murder?  Justifiable homocide? Manslaughter? 
>  
> From 1970 to the present, thirty-six years--the House, Senate and 
> White House have accepted (with a nod and wink) the "disease" 
> lie/perjury from representatives of the Psychiatry-Big Pharma 
> cartel, have embraced it, and have authorized and funded (with our 
> hard-earned tax) billions for the research, diagnosis and treatment 
> of "diseases" that do not exist, conferring upon them the only hint 
> of legitimacy they would ever have.  So doing, our Federal 
> Government has become the third, essential member of the Psychiatry-
> Big Pharma-US Federal Government cartel.  
>  
> Our Federal Government is no longer free commit to our health and 
> well-being.  
>   
> FRED A. BAUGHMAN, JR. M.D.
> NEUROLOGY AND CHILD NEUROLOGY (Board Certified)
> FELLOW, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY
> Author: The ADHD Fraud—How Psychiatry Makes "Patients" of Normal 
> Children
> www.Trafford.com
> 1303 HIDDEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE, EL CAJON, CA 92019, U.S.A. 
> 
>  
> References:
>  
> 1. Cohen MM, editor. American Academy of Neurology: The first 50 
> years, 1948–1998 p 1-8. (1998). St. Paul (Minnesota): American 
> Academy of Neurology.  
>  
> 2. Baughman, F. A., Jr., Hirsch, B.:  Karyotyping of Cells from 
> Cerebrospinal Fluid (letter). Lancet. 1963; 2:417. 
>  
> 3. Baughman, F. A., Jr., List, C. F., Williams, J. R., Muldoon, J. 
> P., Segarra, J. M.:  The Glioma-Polyposis Syndrome.  New England 
> Journal of Medicine, 281:1345-1346, 1969. 
>  
> 4. Carey, WB.  NIH Consensus Conference on ADHD, November 16-18, 
> 1998.  
>  
> 5. Swanson J, Castellanos FX. Biological Bases of Attention Deficit 
> Hyperactivity Disorder. NIH Consensus Development Conference on ADHD 
> (p 37-42, program and abstracts), November 16-18, 1998, National 
> Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD  
> 
> 6. Developmental Trajectories of Brain Volume Abnormalities in 
> Children and Adolescents With Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity 
> Disorder  F. Xavier Castellanos,   Patti P. Lee, MD; Wendy Sharp, 
> MSW; Neal O. Jeffries, PhD; Deanna K. Greenstein, PhD; Liv S. 
> Clasen, PhD; Jonathan D. Blumenthal, MA; Regina S. James, MD; 
> Christen L. Ebens, BA; James M. Walter, MA; Alex Zijdenbos, PhD; 
> Alan C. Evans, PhD; Jay N. Giedd, MD; Judith L. Rapoport, MD  JAMA. 
> 2002;288:1740-1748 . 
>  
> 7. Weinberger DR.  In "Imaging for psychiatric disorders is done 
> mainly for research, not clinical purposes," Neurology Today, June, 
> 2002. 
>  
> 8. Wayne K. Goodman, MD Chair of the US Food and Drug Administration 
> (FDA) Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, quoted in 
> Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 14, 2006. SSRI ads 
> questioned. Colin Meek. Wester Ross, Scotland
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to