--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pretty much the same thing 'cause marzism = nazism. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both are forms of socialism. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The founders of both philosophies were virulent anti- > > Semites > > > > and > > > > > > > > racists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sigh. National Socialists (Nazis) were not socialists by > > the > > > > time > > > > > > WWII got into full swing. > > > > > > > Fascism and socialism are quite far apart in many ways. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Disagree. Nazi-ism was very much a form of socialism. It > > is a > > > > myth > > > > > > created by the Left that it isn't in order to distance the > > Left > > > > from > > > > > > one of their own. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So... define "socialism." > > > > > > > > > > > > > From dictionary.com: > > > > > > > > 1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the > > > > vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production > > and > > > > distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a > > whole. > > > > 2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory. > > > > 3. (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the > > > > transition of a society to communism, characterized by the > > imperfect > > > > implementation of collectivist principles. > > > > > > > > ...pretty much describes Nazi-ism... > > > > > > > > > > Which historians refer to Nazis as socialists? > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/fso5f > > > > > Ah the joys of indiscriminate data-mining: > > > "In April, 1920, Hitler advocated that the party should change its name to the National > Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP). Hitler had always been hostile to socialist ideas, > especially those that involved racial or sexual equality. However, socialism was a popular > political philosophy in Germany after the First World War. This was reflected in the growth > in the German Social Democrat Party (SDP), the largest political party in Germany. > > Hitler, therefore redefined socialism by placing the word 'National' before it. He claimed he > was only in favour of equality for those who had "German blood". Jews and other "aliens" > would lose their rights of citizenship, and immigration of non- Germans should be brought > to an end." >
I am surprised that you take Hitler's philosophy of treating certain races as evidence that Nazi-ism wasn't socialism. Communist countries did that all the time. But the greatest evidence that Nazi-ism was a form of socialism is the incredible similarities economically: both have central control over the means of production. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
