--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 10/1/06 7:24:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
>  
> Oh Judy, that is a no brainer! But since there are people that would have a  
> > problem or not have the guts, we need a law that would allow somebody  who 
> > does have the guts to do so. 100,000 lives can not compare to the  
> *rights*, 
> > whatever they may be, of somebody intent on committing mass  murder.
> >
> 
> Actually, why do we want to institutionalize something  that people agree 
> might be 
> worthwhile in 1 case in a million? Isn't that  an example of an unnecessary 
> law? 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Actually it's a very possible scenario these days and I don't think it  
> should apply to only the nuclear bomb  scenario but to any terrorist action  
> that 
> is intent on taking innocent lives.
>

So, if someone is a terrorist and is plotting to kill another person, the old 
school legal 
system no longer applies just because he is a terrorist?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to