--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning > > no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting > > Republicans > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > Which is why this current scandal is so > > important, > > > > > > given its potential to make these folks > > realize how > > > > > > empty are the claims of this movement's > > leaders. > > > > > > > > > > > > Foley himself is just the straw the camel > > stepped > > > > > > on and broke. It's what his behavior reveals > > about > > > > > > the leaders that their hypocritical > > propaganda that > > > > > > is really significant. > > > > > > > > > > > > (Greenwald's great. But man, he does run > > on!) > > > > > > > > > > > I forget who it was here who said this Foley > > thing is a dodge to > > > > > divert attention from the crumbling Bush claim > > that "Great White > > > > > Father" Bush keeps us safe from terror in the > > "Homeland" (God, I > > > > > detest that word...). > > > > > > > > Wayback and Bhairitu. > > > > > > > > > I think a calculation was made by Rove and the > > Republican > > > > > leadership to sacrifice Foley since it appears > > the House will > > > > > go Democratic anyway, and take the attention > > away from > > > > > Rice 'forgetting' a warning from the CIA re: > > 911, and other > > > > > incidents that have recently come to light > > regarding the ever > > > > > more transparent facade of Bush's "War on > > Terra". > > > > > > > > I think this is tinfoil-hattery, frankly. > > > > > > > > It's even now by no means a foregone conclusion > > that > > > > the Republicans will lose the House, first; > > they're > > > > still pouring money into the races like crazy. > > > > > > > > Second, the scandal has discredited the entire > > > > Republican leadership and by extension > > Republicans > > > > in general. If the Republicans are going to lose > > > > the House, the administration certainly doesn't > > > > want them to lose *big*; they'll want the margin > > > > to be as narrow as possible, so every seat is > > > > worth fighting for, with a strong leadership to > > > > whip the remaining Republicans into an effective > > > > opposition party. > > > > > > > > The administration is certainly going to > > *exploit* > > > > the scandal however it can, to squeeze any > > > > possible advantage out of it now that it's > > > > happened, but it's been too vastly destructive > > > > to the Republican effort for it to have been > > > > worth it just as a distraction. > > > > > > > > Finally, the various other issues--Condi vs. > > > > 9/11 and so on--can all be *finessed* to some > > > > extent--which Republicans are very good at > > doing-- > > > > because they're fairly complicated, whereas the > > > > Foley scandal is very clear-cut and easy for > > > > voters to understand. > > > > > > > I agree with you, Judy. Good analysis. > > > > > > I agree too and was thinking along the lines of > > Judy when I read some > > > of the "deep" thinking conspiracy views. The House > > could be quite > > > close. And any margin, either way, is important. > > > > > > On the other hand, I heard a serious report the > > other night (Hardball > > > or NewsHour) that due to recent things, the Senate > > may be up for grabs > > > -- long thought to be pretty safely Rep. Dems are > > "not behind" in nine > > > key races, and they only need six. > > > > > > Funny that such an new trend coincides with > > Invincibility Course. > > > > > > In the spring or early summer, MMY predicted the > > fall of some > > > governments, specifically UK abd US. If that is > > meant in the > > > parlimentary sense of a change of party, not a > > constitutional > > > collapse, then the Rep gov't could fall in Nov if > > House and Senate > > > change parties. Bush would be a lame Duck > > president, under heavy > > > investigations, with no neither house behinde him. > > Approaching > > > powerlessness. > > > > > He also predicted that people would start TM at > > $2500, pundits would > > come to FFL, NLP would succeed, Peace Palaces would > > be built through > > out the US, everybody would want yagya's, TM mall > > stores would succeed > > .... What makes you give more credence to the > > political predictions? > > I'm sorry, I was in the bubbling bliss of samadhi and > didn't hear what you were saying. Oh, sorry, no time. > Must take rest now. > >
I knew you'd say THAT :-) JohnY To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
