--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> > > 
> 
> 
> ....
> 
> 
> > > If the current ME-atron flow were amped up by a factor of 20 -- and
> > > held for a sustained period -- wouldn't one expect more people coming
> > > to bath in the charged atmosphere? And more pundits? If so, a doubling
> > > of 500 pundits, 2000 sidhas would yield a 4x ME-atron flow. about 1.6
> > > times the daily Utopia daily flow. Those sorts of numbers sustained
> > > over a year or two would be an good test of the ME. A 730 x 100 x
> > > 9000^2 ME-atron stock. = 5913 gME-atrons (gigaME-atrons) aka
> > > Blisstrons.  No stock of gME-atrons / Blisstrons that size has ever
> > > been created by the TMO -- or similar by other groups, AFAIK. Utopia
> > > only created 98 Blisstrons. 
> > > 
> > > Of course this would lead to construction of many Blisstron 
> > > generating plants workld-wide -- like power plants. 
> > > 
> > > And commodity exchanges trading gME-atron / Blisstron options and
> > > futures.
> > >
> > 
> > Sounds like a good follow-up article to that Barron's article.
> Perhaps you should clean it up 
> > and submit...
> 
> The above, and subsequent post, provide a "better" way to look at and
> analyze the data, IMO. But the effect is still not clearly discernable
> -- that is distinguishable from already present trends, or random
> patterns.
> 
> But I plan to update that graphical analysis blog I started. And begin
> to run some statistical regressions using "Blisstrons" as (on of) the
> independent variable -- that is a cumultive variable, aka "stock", not
> a "flow".
> 
> I may periodically send a summary to Barrons. But, I couldn't
> interest, Hagelin, DOJ, or MUM in my blog reports, so I am not too
> sure Barrons is waiting anxiously.
>


Barrons might publish it as a tongue-in-cheek followup. Hagelin and company are 
probably scared that you won't find the ME in the data you're examining, so 
they won't 
look at it, period.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to