--- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Rick Archer <groups@> wrote:
> >
> > From a friend:
> "More cogently, we have to ask whether the research approach is 
> really appropriate to the subject. Are brainwave measurements, no 
> matter how sophisticated, really indicative of the operation or 
> qualities of consciousness? Ontologically, consciousness is a 
> transcendental quality of a transcendental object: the jivatma or 
> spirit soul. Material senses or their extensions such as 
scientific 
> instruments and ordinary logic cannot detect, measure or predict 
the 
> behavior of transcendental objects. The proof is that after so 
much 
> intensive theorizing and experimentation, science is no closer to 
an 
> adequate predictive theory of consciousness today than they were 
30 
> years ago.">>>


In which peer-reviewed scientific journals has this scientist who is 
stating these things been published? What is his field of expertise 
in the sciences?

OffWorld





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to