If you don't get the science, then you'll never get it thru politics.  
If so, then you need to see this:

http://www.dailyplanettv.net/vidpods/DPTV-172-2006-06-09.mov

http://www.dailyplanettv.net/vidpods/DPTV-172-2006-06-09.wmv


On Oct 30, 2006, at 8:36 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:

> Majority Press Release
> Contact:  MARC MORANO (202) 224-5762 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
> MATT DEMPSEY (202) 224-9797 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Renowned Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming – Caps Year
> of Vindication for Skeptics
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> October 17, 2006
> Washington DC - One of the most decorated French geophysicists has
> converted from a believer in manmade catastrophic global warming to
> a climate skeptic. This latest defector from the global warming camp
> caps a year in which numerous scientific studies have bolstered the
> claims of climate skeptics. Scientific studies that debunk the dire
> predictions of human-caused global warming have continued to
> accumulate and many believe the new science is shattering the media-
> promoted scientific "consensus" on climate alarmism.
>
> Claude Allegre, a former government official and an active member of
> France's Socialist Party, wrote an editorial on September 21, 2006
> in the French newspaper L'Express titled "The Snows of Kilimanjaro"
> (For English Translation, click here: http://epw.senate.gov/fact.cfm?
> party=rep&id=264835 ) detailing his newfound skepticism about
> manmade global warming. See:
> http://www.lexpress.fr/idees/tribunes/dossier/allegre/dossier.asp?
> ida=451670 Allegre wrote that the "cause of climate change remains
> unknown" and pointed out that Kilimanjaro is not losing snow due to
> global warming, but to local land use and precipitation changes.
> Allegre also pointed out that studies show that Antarctic snowfall
> rate has been stable over the past 30 years and the continent is
> actually gaining ice.
>
> "Following the month of August experienced by the northern half of
> France, the prophets of doom of global warming will have a lot on
> their plate in order to make our fellow countrymen swallow their
> certitudes," Allegre wrote. He also accused proponents of manmade
> catastrophic global warming of being motivated by money, noting
> that "the ecology of helpless protesting has become a very lucrative
> business for some people!"
>
> Allegre, a member of both the French and U.S. Academy of Sciences,
> had previously expressed concern about manmade global warming. "By
> burning fossil fuels, man enhanced the concentration of carbon
> dioxide in the atmosphere which has raised the global mean
> temperature by half a degree in the last century," Allegre wrote 20
> years ago. In addition, Allegre was one of 1500 scientists who
> signed a November 18, 1992 letter titled "World Scientists' Warning
> to Humanity" in which the scientists warned that global
> warming's "potential risks are very great." See:
> http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~sai/sciwarn.html
>
> Allegre has authored more than 100 scientific articles, written 11
> books and received numerous scientific awards including the
> Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States.
>
> Allegre's conversion to a climate skeptic comes at a time when
> global warming alarmists have insisted that there is a "consensus"
> about manmade global warming. Proponents of global warming have
> ratcheted up the level of rhetoric on climate skeptics recently. An
> environmental magazine in September called for Nuremberg-style
> trials for global warming skeptics and CBS News "60 Minutes"
> correspondent Scott Pelley compared skeptics to "Holocaust deniers."
> See: http://www.epw.senate.gov/fact.cfm?party=rep&id=264568 &
> http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/03/22/publiceye/entry1431768.shtml
> In addition, former Vice President Al Gore has repeatedly referred
> to skeptics as "global warming deniers."
>
> This increase in rhetorical flourish comes at a time when new
> climate science research continues to unravel the global warming
> alarmists' computer model predictions of future climatic doom and
> vindicate skeptics.
>
> 60 Scientists Debunk Global Warming Fears
>
> Earlier this year, a group of prominent scientists came forward to
> question the so-called "consensus" that the Earth faces a "climate
> emergency." On April 6, 2006, 60 scientists wrote a letter to the
> Canadian Prime Minister asserting that the science is deteriorating
> from underneath global warming alarmists.
>
> "Observational evidence does not support today's computer climate
> models, so there is little reason to trust model predictions of the
> future…Significant [scientific] advances have been made since the
> [Kyoto] protocol was created, many of which are taking us away from
> a concern about increasing greenhouse gases. If, back in the mid-
> 1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost
> certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not
> necessary," the 60 scientists wrote. See:
> http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?
> id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605
>
> "It was only 30 years ago that many of today's global-warming
> alarmists were telling us that the world was in the midst of a
> global-cooling catastrophe. But the science continued to evolve, and
> still does, even though so many choose to ignore it when it does not
> fit with predetermined political agendas," the 60 scientists
> concluded.
>
> In addition, an October 16, 2006 Washington Post article
> titled "Climate Change is Nothing New" echoed the sentiments of the
> 60 scientists as it detailed a new study of the earth's climate
> history. The Washington Post article by reporter Christopher Lee
> noted that Indiana University geologist Simon Brassell found climate
> change occurred during the age of dinosaurs and quoted Brassell
> questioning the accuracy of computer climate model predictions.
>
> "If there are big, inherent fluctuations in the system, as
> paleoclimate studies are showing, it could make determining the
> Earth's climatic future even harder than it is," Brassell said. See:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
> dyn/content/article/2006/10/15/AR2006101500672.html
>
> Global Cooling on the Horizon?
>
> In August, Khabibullo Abdusamatov, a scientist who heads the space
> research sector for the Russian Academy of Sciences, predicted long-
> term global cooling may be on the horizon due to a projected
> decrease in the sun's output. See:
> http://en.rian.ru/russia/20060825/53143686.html
>
> Sun's Contribution to Warming
>
> There have also been recent findings in peer-reviewed literature
> over the last few years showing that the Antarctic is getting colder
> and the ice is growing and a new 2006 study in Geophysical Research
> Letters found that the sun was responsible for up to 50% of 20th-
> century warming. See:
> http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2006GL027142.shtml
>
> "Global Warming" Stopped in 1998
>
> Paleoclimate scientist Bob Carter has noted that there is indeed a
> problem with global warming – it stopped in 1998. "According to
> official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the
> University of East Anglia in the UK, the global average temperature
> did not increase between 1998-2005. "…this eight-year period of
> temperature stasis did coincide with society's continued power
> station and SUV-inspired pumping of yet more carbon dioxide into the
> atmosphere," noted paleoclimate researcher and geologist Bob Carter
> of James Cook University in Australia in an April 2006 article
> titled "There is a problem with global warming... it stopped in
> 1998." See: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?
> xml=/opinion/2006/04/09/do0907.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/09/ixworld.ht
> ml
>
> "Global?" Warming Misnamed - Southern Hemisphere Not Warming
>
> In addition, new NASA satellite tropospheric temperature data
> reveals that the Southern Hemisphere has not warmed in the past 25
> years contrary to "global warming theory" and modeling. This new
> Southern Hemisphere data raises the specter that the use of the
> word "global" in "global warming" may not be accurate. A more apt
> moniker for the past 25 years may be "Northern Hemisphere" warming.
> See: http://motls.blogspot.com/2006/09/southern-hemisphere-ignores-
> global.html
>
> Alaska Cooling
>
> According to data released on July 14, 2006 from the National
> Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the January through
> June Alaska statewide average temperature was "0.55F (0.30C) cooler
> than the 1971-2000 average." See:
> http://www.publicaffairs.noaa.gov/releases2006/jul06/noaa06-065.html
>
> Oceans Cooling
>
> Another bombshell to hit the global warming alarmists and their
> speculative climate modeling came in a September article in the
> Geophysical Research Letters which found that over 20% of the heat
> gained in the oceans since the mid-1950s was lost in just two years.
> The former climatologist for the state of Colorado, Roger Pielke,
> Sr., noted that the sudden cooling of the oceans "certainly
> indicates that the multi-decadal global climate models have serious
> issues with their ability to accurately simulate the response of the
> climate system to human- and natural-climate forcings." See:
> http://climatesci.atmos.colostate.edu/2006/09/
>
> Light Hurricane Season & Early Winter
>
> Despite predictions that 2006 would bring numerous tropical storms,
> 2006's surprisingly light hurricane season and the record early
> start of this year's winter in many parts of the U.S. have further
> put a damper on the constant doomsaying of the global warming
> alarmists and their media allies.
>
> Droughts Less Frequent
>
> Other new studies have debunked many of the dubious claims made by
> the global warming alarmists. For example, the claim that droughts
> would be more frequent, severe and wide ranging during global
> warming, has now being exposed as fallacious. A new paper in
> Geophysical Research Letters authored by Konstantinos Andreadis and
> Dennis Lettenmaier finds droughts in the U.S. becoming "shorter,
> less frequent and cover a small portion of the country over the last
> century."
> http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/10/13/where-are-the-
> droughts
>
> Global Warming Will Not Lead to Next Ice Age
>
> Furthermore, recent research has shown that fears that global
> warming could lead to the next ice age, as promoted in the 2004
> Hollywood movie "The Day After Tomorrow" are also unsupportable. A
> 2005 media hyped study "claimed to have found a 30 percent slowdown
> in the thermohaline circulation, the results are published in the
> very prestigious Nature magazine, and the story was carried
> breathlessly by the media in outlets around the world…Less than a
> year later, two different research teams present convincing evidence
> [ in Geophysical Research Letters ] that no slowdown is occurring
> whatsoever," according to Virginia State Climatologist Patrick
> Michaels, editor of the website World Climate Report. See:
> http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2006/10/13/overturning-
> ocean-hype
>
> `Hockey Stick' Broken in 2006
>
> The "Hockey Stick" temperature graph's claim that the 1990's was the
> hottest decade of the last 1000 years was found to be unsupportable
> by the National Academy of Sciences and many independent experts in
> 2006. See: http://www.epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?
> party=rep&id=257697
>
> Study Shows Greenland's Ice Growing
>
> A 2005 study by a scientist named Ola Johannessen and his colleagues
> showed that the interior of Greenland is gaining ice mass. See:
> http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/articles/V8/N44/C1.js
> p Also, according to the International Arctic Research Institute,
> despite all of the media hype, the Arctic was warmer in the 1930's
> than today.
>
> Polar Bears Not Going Extinct
>
> Despite Time Magazine and the rest of the media's unfounded hype,
> polar bears are not facing a crisis, according to biologist Dr.
> Mitchell Taylor from the Arctic government of Nunavut. "Of the 13
> populations of polar bears in Canada, 11 are stable or increasing in
> number. They are not going extinct, or even appear to be affected at
> present," Taylor wrote on May 1, 2006. See:
> http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?
> pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1146433819696&cal
> l_pageid=970599119419
>
> Media Darling James Hansen Hypes Alarmism
>
> As all of this new data debunking climate alarmism mounts, the
> mainstream media chooses to ignore it and instead focus on the dire
> predictions of the number-one global warming media darling, NASA's
> James Hansen. The increasingly alarmist Hansen is featured
> frequently in the media to bolster sky-is-falling climate scare
> reports. His recent claim that the Earth is nearing its hottest
> point in one million years has been challenged by many scientists.
> See:
> http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/articles/V9/N39/EDITB
> .jsp Hansen's increasingly frightening climate predictions follow
> his 2003 concession that the use of "extreme scenarios" was an
> appropriate tactic to drive the public's attention to the urgency of
> global warming. See: http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-
> 16/ns_jeh6.html Hansen also received a $250,000 grant form Teresa
> Heinz's Foundation and then subsequently endorsed her husband John
> Kerry for President and worked closely with Al Gore to promote his
> movie, "An Inconvenient Truth." See:
> http://www.heinzawards.net/speechDetail.asp?speechID=6 &
> http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/dai_complete.pdf
>
> American People Rejecting Global Warming Alarmism
>
> The global warming alarmists may have significantly overplayed their
> hand in the climate debate. A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll this
> August found that most Americans do not attribute the cause of any
> recent severe weather events to global warming, and the portion of
> Americans who believe that climate change is due to natural
> variability has increased over 50% in the last five years.
>
> Senator Inhofe Chastises Media For Unscientific & Unprincipled
> Climate Reporting
>
> Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.) Chairman of the Environment and
> Public Works Committee, commented last week on the media's unfounded
> global warming hype and some of the recent scientific research that
> is shattering the so-called "consensus" that human greenhouse gas
> emissions have doomed the planet.
>
> "The American people are fed up with media for promoting the idea
> that former Vice President Al Gore represents the
> scientific `consensus' that SUV's and the modern American way of
> life have somehow created a `climate emergency' that only United
> Nations bureaucrats and wealthy Hollywood liberals can solve. It is
> the publicity and grant seeking global warming alarmists and their
> advocates in the media who have finally realized that the
> only "emergency" confronting them is their rapidly crumbling
> credibility, audience and bottom line. The global warming alarmists
> know their science is speculative at best and their desperation
> grows each day as it becomes more and more obvious that many of the
> nations that ratified the woeful Kyoto Protocol are failing to
> comply," Senator Inhofe said last week. See:
> http://www.epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264616
>
> "The mainstream media needs to follow the money: The further you get
> from scientists who conduct these alarmist global warming studies,
> and the further you get from the financial grants and the
> institutions that they serve the more the climate alarmism fades and
> the skepticism grows," Senator Inhofe explained.
>
> Eco-Doomsayers' Failed Predictions
>
> In a speech on the Senate floor on September 25, 2006, Senator
> Inhofe pointed out the abject failure of past predictions of
> ecological disaster made by environmental alarmists.
>
> "The history of the modern environmental movement is chock-full of
> predictions of doom that never came true. We have all heard the dire
> predictions about the threat of overpopulation, resource scarcity,
> mass starvation, and the projected death of our oceans. None of
> these predictions came true, yet it never stopped the doomsayers
> from continuing to predict a dire environmental future. The more the
> eco-doomsayers' predictions fail, the more the eco-doomsayers
> predict," Senator Inhofe said on September 25th. See:
> http://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263759
>
> Related Links:
>
> For a comprehensive review of the media's embarrassing 100-year
> history of alternating between promoting fears of a coming ice age
> and global warming, see Environment & Public Works Chairman James
> Inhofe's September 25, 2006 Senate floor speech debunking the media
> and climate alarmism. Go to: (epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?
> party=rep&id=263759)
>
> To read and watch Senator Inhofe on CNN discuss global warming go
> to: (http://www.epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=264308 )
>
> To Read all of Senator Inhofe's Speeches on global warming go to:
> (http://epw.senate.gov/speeches.cfm?party=rep)
>
> "Inhofe Correct On Global Warming," by David Deming geophysicist, an
> adjunct scholar with the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs
> (ocpathink.org), and an associate professor of Arts and Sciences at
> the University of Oklahoma. (http://epw.senate.gov/fact.cfm?
> party=rep&id=264537)
>
>
> # # # # #
>
>
>
>
>
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Or go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!'
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to