--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only thing > both courts DECIDED was to dismiss the lawsuit as being improper under the > law that was > used to justify the lawsuit in the first place: In a lawyerly mood... The above should read: "The only thing EITHER court decided" since my original phrasing implies that there were possibly decisions made by one court and not the other. However, both courts DID find that there was no evidence of a breach of trust by S. Shatananda, so my original statement isn't quite correct either way. Note that the Supreme Court also explicitly mentions the hypocracy of the plaintiffs in the first place: http://www.austlii.edu.au/~andrew/CommonLII/INSC/1974/153.html [...] "If the real purpose in bringing the Suit was to vindicate the general right of the public to have the rightful claimant appointed to the office,, there was no reason why the plaintiffs omitted to implead or at least refer in the plaint to the three persons nominated by Brahmanand in his will to succeed him in the order indicated therein especially when it is seen that the plaintiffs accepted the custom of the Math to have the successor nominated by the incumbent for the time, being of the office of Shankaracharya. The Trial Court as well as the High Court found that there was no evidence to substantiate the allegations regarding the breach of trust, " To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
