In a message dated 11/1/06 8:44:58 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So Kerry was reporting a bunch of hearsay to congress?
>

He was repeating testimony. That's not repeating hearsay. If he was using that testimony
to attempt to prove that such things happened, it would be hearsay, but he merely
asserted that he had heard the testimony from those who claimed that they themselves
had committed the acts.

In fact, it is entirely possible that his testimony COULD have been used in a trial against
the people who made the confessions. Hearsay isn't always really hearsay, according to the
law.

So this testimony  that was given was in a court under oath, that Kerry repeated to congress?
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to