Fudging of Numbers is nothing new. Multi-national Corporates which fund Pharmaceuticals put pressure on researchers who fudge numbers and hide Side-Effects.
In any field, several independent researchers have to confirm any research before it's accepted.
Besides the Indian TM-org cooks the account books. Shows false income figures.
TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:41:15
-0000
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: $12 million study on TM...
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: $12 million study on TM...
To be more charitable, I doubt that many, if any, of
the researchers or the PR blurbers think that they're
actually lying. They just have so much invested in
the world view that was sold to them by Maharishi
that they filter out anything from their perceptions
(and their research) that doesn't match that world
view. The world view is *by definition* correct,
because of the highest law of nature, which is
"Maharishi sez." Therefore if the facts don't seem
to agree, there must be something wrong with the facts,
and they should be ignored as the anomalies they are.
the researchers or the PR blurbers think that they're
actually lying. They just have so much invested in
the world view that was sold to them by Maharishi
that they filter out anything from their perceptions
(and their research) that doesn't match that world
view. The world view is *by definition* correct,
because of the highest law of nature, which is
"Maharishi sez." Therefore if the facts don't seem
to agree, there must be something wrong with the facts,
and they should be ignored as the anomalies they are.
--- Peter <drpetersutphen@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > This is called PR science. It is a pile of shit and
> > > any serious scientist knows it. I'd love to see them
> > > try to publish this "research". What a joke. It is an
> > > insult to MMY and this tradition.
> > >
> > > This is called PR science. It is a pile of shit and
> > > any serious scientist knows it. I'd love to see them
> > > try to publish this "research". What a joke. It is an
> > > insult to MMY and this tradition.
> On Nov 7, 2006, at 2:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
> > Eh, it is PR, but then again ALL research done at MUM is PR.
> >
> > OTOH, what if hagelin's predictions hold up, at least somewhat?
> >
> > OTOH, what if hagelin's predictions hold up, at least somewhat?
--- Vaj <vajranatha@ ...> wrote:
> They most likely WILL, but when the TMO is concerned numbers
> almost always lie.
> almost always lie.
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail. __._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
