--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" > <reavismarek@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > I have a pretty good idea what MMY means by it, > > > although not experientially, because, as I've > > > said, that sort of thing has simply never worked > > > for me. > <snip> > > > > But you are incorrect in stating that it doesn't work for you; it > > works demonstrably fine. The motor is on and running; reverse or > > forward are just the just the directions. That's the driver's > > decision. > > As far as I can tell, this formulation just > moves it back a level without > adding/subtracting/changing/clarifying anything. > > What I'm saying is that I've tried keeping my > attention on the positive and away from the > negative, and as a result have not seen the > positive grow in my life, nor the negative > decrease. > > For me, experientially, these kinds of > formulations are empty of significance. If > there's an on/off switch or a gearshift, I > haven't been able to locate it. > > Which is why, incidentally, I started TM in > the first place. Transcending on/off and > backward/forward *does* work for me. > **
All the good stuff comes from transcending, that's for sure. All the best.
