--- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Comment below: > > ** > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > new.morning wrote: > > > Unbelievable! > > > > > > -------------------- > > > > > > > > > > http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/11/robertson_says.html?tr=y&auid=2164219 > > > > > > A viewer wrote in to ask Pat Robertson a question > > > > > > Why [do] evangelical Christians tell non-Christians that Jesus > > > (God) is the only way to Heaven? Those who are Hindu, Buddhist, > > > Islamic, etc. already know and have a relationship with God. Why is > > > this? It seems disrespectful. > > > > > > Robertson replied that it is not all disrespectful because all other > > > religions really just worship "demonic powers." > > > > > > No. They don't have a relationship. There is the god of the > > > Bible, who is Jehovah. When you see L-O-R-D in caps, that is the > > > name. It's not Allah, it's not Brahma, it's not Shiva, it's not > > > Vishnu, it's not Buddha. It is Jehovah God. They don't have a > > > relationship with him. He is the God of all Gods. These others are > > > mostly demonic powers. Sure they're demons. There are many demons in > > > the world. > > > > > > with link to video > > Give the way languages tended to morph Jehovah may well have originally > > been Shiva due to the similarity in sound (and I just love pointing > > things like this out to evangelicals). :) > > > **End** > > What pleased me was the fact that Robertson knew the trimurti; I can't > imagine 99% of his listeners or congregants could name Brahma, Vishnu > and Shiva. Obviously, he is informed enough, or studied enough to > understand some of the basic concepts. > > And he talks about the LORD as being the God of all Gods! Well that > certainly seems to be something of a capitulation to the Hindu > philosophy of many faces, one God. Even saying that on his program > plants some seeds of possibilities that may sprout later on in someone > who hears it today. It's not quite the doctrine of monotheism that > the Christian fundamentalists generally teach. > But he goes on to say, "These others are mostly demonic powers. Sure they're demons. There are many demons in the world."
If a follower really believes this sermon, deeply, and is committed to doing "good" in their eyes, what could be "better" for society that isolating such demon followers, not giving them access to society -- even thinking of bombing some demon restarurants, or temples, or taking out some of those demon worshipers -- as "good things". I mean think about it. "DEMONS!" In the literal sense of the word. .
