--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], bob_brigante <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > Above all, Bobby says, he had no intention of hiding > anything. "Our > > > > success on the media team is based on the fact that we are > always > > > > honest and open with the press. We value our relationship with > the > > > > Fairfield community, and the trust we share, above everything, > and > > > > we would never do anything consciously to jeopardize that." > > > > > > Except not tell the people for whom the article was > > > intended that it had been edited from the original > > > version... > > > > How Chopraesque of them. Note that everyone reading this forum > knows damn well thta > > Chopra does it all the time with his own stuff, and no-one blinks > an eye. BobbyRoth does it in > > an e-mail, and it's open season on the TMO. > > Very different, Lawson. Not even remotely > in the same ballpark. Chopra's rewriting his > own material under his own copyright, not > something somebody else wrote that was > published in a newspaper. >
But the info was released for private consumption (more or less) via an email. The website version was inadvertently put up or so Bobby asserts. The Global Good News website rewrites stuff all the time, but doesn't put quotes around it as though it were the original article. Did the email/website we're talking about now do this? AND... was there a substantial change in the facts given? In the case of Chopra's writings, he DID rewrite substantially.
