--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "lurkernomore20002000" > <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Peter <drpetersutphen@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- sparaig <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Peter > > > > > <drpetersutphen@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Amen to that, brother. I actually transecend while > > > > > > doing the middle rhythm of SK. Its very funny > > > > > because > > > > > > the mind loses all content other than the > > > > > foundational > > > > > > intent it had right before it transcended/stopped > > > > > and > > > > > > when it becomes active again it has no idea why > > > > > the > > > > > > body is huffing and puffing for a few moments > > > > > before > > > > > > memory kicks in. SK is really quite amazing. A > > > > > yogic > > > > > > cognition by SSRS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Completely different than TM's transcendental > > > > > consciousness. > > > > > > > > Sparaig, you have truly got to be kidding me. First of > > > > all this is my experience, not yours and second of all > > > > you don't even do SK. You are only speaking out of TB > > > > dogma, now aren't you? Transcendental consciousness > > > > can be reached by a near infinite number of procedures > > > > and techniques. It boggles the mind to think that you > > > > truly believe that MMY and the techniques of the TMO > > > > are the only valid and legitimate means of > > > > experiencing what one already "is."? > > > > > > *You* have to be kidding, Peter, to suggest > > > Lawson said anything even remotely like that. > > > > Lawson English. Master of the Ready, Shoot, Aim. > > This applies more to Peter in this case than > it does to Lawson. > > Actually, I more or less agree with Lawson on > this, in that what Peter described sure doesn't > *sound* like TM's transcendental consciousness. > And that's based on my experience of TM, not on > TM "dogma." > > But for Peter to claim Lawson was saying TM is > the only way to achieve transcendental > consciousness is just so far off target it's > mind-boggling. It's ready, shoot, don't even > bother about the aiming part. > > Same with Barry claiming Lawson was trying to > excuse the TMO's making changes in the WaPo > article by resorting to the "Yeah, but they > do it too" argument. Barry is well aware > that Lawson has been beating up on Chopra for > years for rewriting his books. He doesn't > excuse Chopra, so how could he possibly be > using Chopra to excuse the TMO? > > We all know Barry gets stupid when he's > overcome by his compulsion to put down TMers. > It's just very odd to see Peter doing the > same thing.
Why odd ? This has been Peters agenda for years. This little thing, changing a word here and there in a silly article, and all the TM-haters goes bananas. They seem to become more and more desperate as the success from the Invincible America course grows stronger. There is a great purification going on worldwide, and the TM-haters are just in the middle of it.
