Bwahaha, scientific humour. How droll. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Vaj 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:48 PM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Intelligent Design: The Clincher


        The Scientist
        ?

        http://www.the-scientist.com/2006/12/1/53/1/
        ?

        Intelligent Design: The Clincher
        A butterfly explodes the theory.



       


       


             
              What can we make of the complications that led the Large Blue 
butterfly (Maculinea arion) to extinction in Britain? 

             
       At first sight, nothing could seem less intelligent than the design of a 
flying insect. From an egg laid in or on a food supply, it hatches into a 
slow-moving eating machine that keeps outgrowing its skin, so that it has to 
molt every few days. At the moment of molting, it is extremely vulnerable to 
predators and parasites. Then, inexplicably, it stops moving and grows a hard 
shell, inside which it completely redesigns its body from square one, to emerge 
into a thing with wings that launches itself into hundreds of cubic miles of 
atmosphere in search of a mate, and a food plant, with nothing to guide it but 
a few stray molecules - pheromones and plant odors - blowing in the wind.


        The fact is, however, that this is a very efficient system for 
spreading the genes of that species around the landscape, and for locating food 
plants that would take an Earth-bound caterpillar days to find by dint of much 
hard crawling. The proof is that there are more species of insect than any 
other class of animal, and their biomass outweighs the mammals, even though the 
latter include all the elephants on earth and close to a billion overweight 
humans as well.


        OK, that complicated life cycle seems an intelligent creation in the 
end. But what can we make of the further complications that led the Large Blue 
butterfly (Maculinea arion) to extinction in Britain? It entrusts a critical 
stage in its life cycle to the tender care of a single species of red ant that 
is particularly finicky about where it nests.


        The story goes like this: The Large Blue lays its eggs in the buds of 
thyme - the culinary herb that grows wild in Europe - in the tight-bud stage. 
If the butterfly is ready to lay its eggs before the buds appear, or not until 
after they have started to open, the brood is lost. The eggs hatch after one or 
two weeks, depending on the weather; warm weather speeds hatching. The young 
caterpillars feed on thyme flowers for about two weeks during late July and 
early August, then fall to the ground where they are "adopted" by red ants 
(Myrmica sabuleti) attracted by a sugary substance secreted from a dorsal 
gland. The ants carry the caterpillar back to their nest, where it then gorges 
on ant larvae. While hidden from its own predators, the caterpillar spends 10 
months as a predator in the ant nest, and then pupates there. After three weeks 
pupation the butterfly emerges during the four weeks mid-June to mid-July.


        M. sabuleti is a warmth-loving ant that thrives only in short, dry 
grassland on hot south-facing slopes that are heavily grazed. If the grass 
grows higher than 3-4 cm and shades the ground, cooling it, this ant dies out 
and other species of ant take over - ants that are not interested in providing 
free food and lodging for Large Blue caterpillars. Taller grass also crowds out 
thyme.


        What happened in Britain was a constellation of events that conspired 
to spell disaster for the Large Blue. One was the increased use of chemical 
fertilizers that promote vigorous grass growth, which kills off small wild 
flowers such as thyme. Then, sheep were pulled off the land by a change in 
livestock farming. For a few years, rabbits spread and kept the grass short in 
habitats favored by the butterfly, but in the 1950s myxomatosis (a viral 
disease of rabbits) was introduced and eliminated them. Pastures also were 
previously burned over, which kept the grass short, but this is no longer done.


        So here you have an insect that depends for its very existence on a 
fragile chain of circumstances that is easily broken by bad weather, changes in 
exposure to grazing due to human intervention and disease, loss of its unique 
food plant, and loss of its protector ant species. If I were to design such a 
silly system I'd at least choose the most abundant, hardy species of ant to 
host my caterpillars, and ensure that they could feed on other plants beside 
thyme, and at other stages than the bud. To me, the case of the Large Blue is 
conclusive disproof of the theory of intelligent design.


        Jack Woodall is director of the Nucleus for the Investigation of 
Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Institute of Medical Biochemistry at 
Brazil's Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. 


<<attachment: 53-1.jpg>>

Reply via email to