Allright, Allright, Don't kill us with this suspense.
So, Chopra did sue Skolnick. Right
authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:45:59 -0000
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: JAMA Caper
The title, as you know, is "Maharishi Ayur-Veda:
Guru's Marketing Scheme Promises World Eternal
'Perfect Health.'"
There isn't any "debate" about the title of the
article. All I'm doing here is correcting your
knowingly false statements.
As I've already explained, it's in storage. But
there are plenty of quotes from it, as I've also
already pointed out (and as you know anyway), in
my and others' posts in the discussions on alt.m.t.
And as you know, the case was dismissed before the
motion could be ruled on, as I went on to speculate
in the very post you quote, and as Skolnick himself
confirmed in his response, in the very same thread.
> > And yes, I could, but since you can do that perfectly well for
> > yourself, of course I'm not going to bother.
> >
> Why not, you seem to have plenty of time debating this fellow about
> the title of the article.
> Maybe you don't have a copy to quote from.
> From: Judy Stein
> Date: Sun, May 30 1999 12:00 am
> Groups: alt.meditation. transcendental, sci.skeptic
> Subject: Move Over Maharishi
> http://tinyurl. com/worhk
>
> At some point after the preliminary injunction ruling, plaintiffs
> moved to have Deepak Chopra, who had been extensively and viciously
> disparaged by name in Andrew's article, added as a plaintiff.
---------------------------------
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
