--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > Chopra did sue Skolnick > > > > > > jstein wrote: > > > No, as you know, Chopra did not sue Skolnick. > > > > > There seems to be some confusion on this: Chopra at the time > > WAS the TMO and he owned MAPI and the Lancaster Foundation. > > No, he owned neither, as you know. (And MAPI, of > course, as you know, was not involved in the suit.) > > Apparently Chopra > > was a Plaintive in the suit. What's up with that? > > No, he was not a plaintiff in the suit. There isn't > any confusion about it at all, other than the > confusion you're attempting to create. >
Chopra was founder of MAPI, I THINK, and was head of MAAA and AAAP ((or some such). He was NOT the head of any profit-making organization at the time of the article,though he should have put any past and current affiliations into his financial disclosure form to avoid giving JAMA any ammo in the war they were waging against alternative medicine during that period.
